Cited by 1,499Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Instability of a 550-Base Pair DNA Segment and Abnormal Methylation in Fragile X Syndrome

Oberlé, I., Rousseau, F., Heitz, D., Kretz, C., Devys, D., Hanauer, A., Boué, J., Bertheas, M. F. +1 more·1991·Science

Abstract

The fragile X syndrome, a common cause of inherited mental retardation, is characterized by an unusual mode of inheritance. Phenotypic expression has been linked to abnormal cytosine methylation of a single CpG island, at or very near the fragile site. Probes adjacent to this island detected very localized DNA rearrangements that constituted the fragile X mutations, and whose target was a 550-base pair GC-rich fragment. Normal transmitting males had a 150- to 400-base pair insertion that was inherited by their daughters either unchanged, or with small differences in size. Fragile X-positive individuals in the next generation had much larger fragments that differed among siblings and showed a generally heterogeneous pattern indicating somatic mutation. The mutated allele appeared unmethylated in normal transmitting males, methylated only on the inactive X chromosome in their daughters, and totally methylated in most fragile X males. However, some males had a mosaic pattern. Expression of the fragile X syndrome thus appears to result from a two-step mutation as well as a highly localized methylation. Carriers of the fragile X mutation can easily be detected regardless of sex or phenotypic expression, and rare apparent false negatives may result from genetic heterogeneity or misdiagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.252.5009.1097

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oberlé, I., Rousseau, F., Heitz, D., Kretz, C., Devys, D., Hanauer, A., Boué, J., Bertheas, M. F., & Mandel, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Hôpital Nord (FR)
Venue
Science
Published
1991-05-24
Volume
252
Issue
5009
Pages
1097-1102
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2051013729
Cited by
1,499
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
63.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, DNA instability, CpG island methylation, fragile sites, somatic mutations, X chromosome inactivation, carrier detection, genetic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Base Composition, DNA, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Genetic Carrier Screening, Humans, Male, Methylation, Mutation, Pedigree, Phenotype, X Chromosome, Restriction Mapping, Gene Rearrangement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review