Cited by 42Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Early-life factors, in-utero exposures and endometriosis risk: a meta-analysis

Open access
Ottolina, Jessica, Schimberni, Matteo, Makieva, Sofia, Bartiromo, Ludovica, Fazia, Teresa, Bernardinelli, Luisa, Viganò, Paola, Candiani, Massimo +1 more·2020·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to offer a general picture of the available data on the effects of early-life factors on the risk of developing endometriosis in adult life. An advanced, systematic search of the online medical databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL was limited to full-length manuscripts published in English in peer-reviewed journals up to February 2019. Log of relative risk (RR) was employed to calculate the pooled effect sizes using both fixed and random effects modelling and I-squared tests to assess heterogeneity. Funnel plots were used to investigation publication bias. The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42019138668). Six studies that included a total of 2360 women affected by endometriosis were analysed. The pooled results showed that the risk of developing endometriosis in adult life was significantly increased by being born prematurely (logRR 0.21, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.40), having a low birthweight (logRR 0.35, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.54), being formula-fed (logRR 0.65, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.95) and having been exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES) in utero (logRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.04. Among intrauterine and early neonatal exposures, prematurity, birthweight, formula feeding and DES were risk factors for the development of endometriosis in adult life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.005

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottolina, J., Schimberni, M., Makieva, S., Bartiromo, L., Fazia, T., Bernardinelli, L., Viganò, P., Candiani, M., & Gentilini, D.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Ottolina, Jessica
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
279-289
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024766212
Cited by
42
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, early life risk factors, prenatal exposure, preterm birth, low birth weight, bottle feeding, diethylstilbestrol, neonatal exposure, endometriosis risk
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review