Cited by 7Reproductive Biology and FertilityEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Deciding on future fertility: considerations of girls with Turner syndrome and their parents to opt for or against ovarian tissue cryopreservation

Open access
Nadesapillai, Sapthami, van der Coelen, Sanne, Goebel, Lianne, Peek, Ronald, Braat, Didi DM, van der Velden, Janiëlle AEM, Fleischer, Kathrin, Oerlemans, Anke JM·2023·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the considerations of girls with Turner syndrome and their parents to opt for or against ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)? DESIGN: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with girls with Turner syndrome and their parents until data saturation was reached. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Thirteen parents and five girls who opted for OTC, and seven parents and three girls who declined OTC, were interviewed. Parents and girls mentioned that OTC offered hope, an opportunity to have genetic offspring and clarity about their current fertility status. Most participants were not afraid of the risks of surgery and trusted healthcare providers with this procedure. In contrast, families had to deal with uncertainties, owing to the lack of information on the success rate and long-term consequences of OTC in this group. Families indicated that they had to go through an important decision-making process in a short period of time, because of the limited number of participants in the OTC study. CONCLUSION: A new opportunity and hope for future fertility were considerations for opting for OTC. However, OTC also came with uncertainties owing to the experimental nature of this procedure in girls with Turner syndrome. Healthcare providers could share these experiences with girls with Turner syndrome and their parents to improve fertility-preservation counselling in this group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.02.013

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early referral for fertility preservation, including for pre-adolescent or adolescent individuals with TS, might improve outcomes.

    “Early referral for fertility preservation—including for pre-adolescent or adolescent individuals with TS—might improve outcomes572,623 and allow time to consider goals/implications and the possibility of fertility preservation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pasquino, A.M., Passeri, F., Pucarelli, I., Segni, M., Municchi, G., 1997. Spontaneous pubertal development in Turner's syndrome. Italian Study Group for Turner's Syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82 (6), 1810 -1813. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1472-6483(2300124-4/sbref0021)
  2. van der Coelen, S., Schleedoorn, M.J., Nadesapillai, S., Peek, R., Braat, D.D.M., van der Velden, A.A.E.M., Fleischer, K., Oerlemans, A.J.M., 2022. Evaluation of the decision-making process on ovarian tissue cryopreservation in girls with Turner syndrome by patients, parents and caregivers. Human Reproduction. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1472-6483(2300124-4/sbref0034)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nadesapillai, S., van der Coelen, S., Goebel, L., Peek, R., Braat, D. D., van der Velden, J. A., Fleischer, K., & Oerlemans, A. J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Nadesapillai, Sapthami
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1025
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323075005
Cited by
7
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  • EMD Serono (A16-1395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
Turner syndrome, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, fertility preservation, decision-making, parents, girls, fertility counseling, uncertainty, hope, trust in healthcare providers, surgical risk
MeSH terms
Female, Fertility, Humans, Parents, Turner Syndrome, Cryopreservation, Fertility Preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review