Does nutritional intervention maintain its prognostic benefit in the long term for malnourished patients hospitalised for heart failure?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the PICNIC study, 39% of the intervention group had died compared to 59% of the control group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89; p=0.017).
“Thirty-nine % of the IG had died compared to 59% of the CG (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89; p ¼ 0.017)”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
In the PICNIC study, benefits persisted at 24 months, as the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in control patients (73.8%) compared to intervention patients (47.5%) (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.72; p=0.001).
“The benefits of the nutritional intervention persisted at 24 months, as the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in of the CG patients (73.8%) compared to in 47.5% of IG patients (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28e0.72;p ¼ 0.001).”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of diet and nutrition in heart failure: A state-of-the-art narrative review
Billingsley, H. E., Hummel, S. L., & Carbone, S. (2020) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2020.08.004 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients
Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonilla-Palomas, J. L., Gámez-López, A. L., Castillo-Domínguez, J. C., Moreno-Conde, M., López-Ibáñez, M. C., & Anguita-Sánchez, M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
- Venue
- Revista Clínica Española (English Edition)
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 58-60
- ISSN
- 2254-8874 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774801544
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Revista Clínica Española (English Edition) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- heart failure, malnutrition, dietary intervention, hospitalized patients, all-cause mortality, heart failure readmission, long-term prognosis, personalized nutrition, randomized controlled trials, post-discharge follow-up, exercise training, cardiac rehabilitation, cardiac catheterization, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac arrhythmias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
