Cited by 117Digital Transformation in IndustryEngineering Technology and MethodologiesManufacturing Process and Optimization

Hybrid learning-based digital twin for manufacturing process: modeling framework and implementation

Open access
Huang, Ziqi, Fey, Marcel, Liu, Chao, Beysel, Ege, Xu, Xun, Brecher, Christian·2023·Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102545

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-enhanced development tools are deployed within Industry 4.0 environments to enable faster prototyping, adaptive maintenance, and real-time data processing.

    “AI-enhanced development tools are deployed within these environments to enable faster prototyping, adaptive maintenance, and real-time data processing [2].”

    From Redefining the Programmer: Human-AI Collaboration, LLMs, and Security in Modern Software Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction describes AI-driven digital twins in Industry 4.0 as providing real-time analysis, and the Service section describes condition monitoring and predictive maintenance. Our copy does not establish faster prototyping, and its subject is specifically digital twins for manufacturing rather than AI-enhanced development tools generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. C. Brecher, A. Epple, M. Fey, M. Königs, S. Neus, F. Wellmann, Lernende produktionssysteme, in: Proceedings of the Internet of Pro- duction für agile Unternehmen: AWK Aachener Werkzeugmaschinen- Kolloquium, Vol. 18, 2017.
  2. [23]23. B. Zhou, Z. Zheng, D. Zhou, G. Cheng, E. Jiménez-Ruiz, T.-K. Tran, D. Stepanova, M. H. Gad-Elrab, N. Nikolov, A. Soylu, et al., The data value quest: a holistic semantic approach at bosch, in: The Semantic Web: ESWC 2022 Satellite Events: Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, May 29-June 2, 2022, Proceedings, Springer, 2022, pp. 287-290.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Z., Fey, M., Liu, C., Beysel, E., Xu, X., & Brecher, C.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Aston University (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT (DE)
Corresponding author
Huang, Ziqi
Venue
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
82
Pages
102545
ISSN
0736-5845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321381797
Cited by
117
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 10
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (390621612, EXC-2023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
digital twin, hybrid learning, machine tools, machining, digital thread, multi-fidelity data, machine tool modeling, uncertainty estimation, adaptive process control, Industry 4.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review