Cited by 22Robot Manipulation and LearningScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsManufacturing Process and Optimization

Safety-efficiency integrated assembly: The next-stage adaptive task allocation and planning framework for human–robot collaboration

Zhao, Ruihan, Tao, Sichen, Li, Pengzhong·2025·Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102942

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, R., Tao, S., & Li, P.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • University of Toyama (JP)
Corresponding author
Li, Pengzhong
Venue
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
94
Pages
102942
ISSN
0736-5845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406123483
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tongji University (2023020043)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJSP2145)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
human-robot collaboration, assembly planning, task allocation, safety-efficiency trade-off, execution time optimization, constrained multi-objective optimization, computer assembly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review