Cited by 843Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT

Open access
McCollough, Cynthia H., Primak, Andrew N., Braun, Natalie, Kofler, James, Yu, Lifeng, Christner, Jodie·2009·Radiologic Clinics of North America

Abstract

In recent years, the media has focused on the potential danger of radiation exposure from CT, even though the potential benefit of a medically indicated CT far outweighs the potential risks. This attention has reminded the radiology community that doses must be as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) while maintaining diagnostic image quality. To satisfy the ALARA principle, the dose reduction strategies described in this article must be well understood and properly used. The use of CT must also be justified for the specific diagnostic task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McCollough, 2002, Dose optimization in CT: creation, implementation and clinical acceptance of size-based technique charts, Radiology, 225, 591
  2. Schmidt B. Dose calculations for computed tomography [dissertation]. Reports from the Insitute of Medical Physiks 2001;7 [in German].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 843

Metadata

Authors
McCollough, C. H., Primak, A. N., Braun, N., Kofler, J., Yu, L., & Christner, J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
McCollough, Cynthia H.
Venue
Radiologic Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
27-40
ISSN
0033-8389 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020820596
Cited by
842
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 58
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiologic Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007986)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
CT dose reduction, low-dose CT, ALARA principle, radiation risk, diagnostic quality, radiation protection
MeSH terms
Humans, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Protection, Radiometry, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review