The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems
Abstract
Introduction and objectives Over the last decade, telemedicine applied to pacemaker monitoring has undergone extraordinary growth. It is not known if telemonitoring is more or less efficient than conventional monitoring. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review analyzing the available evidence on resource use and health outcomes in both follow-up modalities. Methods We searched 11 databases and included studies published up until November 2014. The inclusion criteria were: a) experimental or observational design; b) studies based on complete economic evaluations; c) patients with pacemakers, and d) telemonitoring compared with conventional hospital monitoring. Results Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, providing information on 2852 patients, with a mean age of 81 years. The main indication for device implantation was atrioventricular block. With telemonitoring, cardiovascular events were detected and treated 2 months earlier than with conventional monitoring, thus reducing length of hospital stay by 34% and reducing routine and emergency hospital visits as well. There were no significant intergroup differences in perceived quality of life or number of adverse events. The cost of telemonitoring was 60% lower than that of conventional hospital monitoring. Conclusions Compared with conventional monitoring, cardiovascular events were detected earlier and the number or hospitalizations and hospital visits was reduced with pacemaker telemonitoring. In addit…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“with no significant difference between groups in quality of life or adverse events [65].”
From Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation (2020) · cites this paper as [65]
In the citing paper
“Compared to hospital monitoring, pacemaker remote monitoring interventions were cost-effective from a provider or societal perspective”
From Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation (2020) · cites this paper as [65]
Citations
Cites
A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial)
Mabo, P., Victor, F., Bazin, P., Ahres, S., Babuty, D., Da Costa, A., Binet, D., & Daubert, J.-C. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr419 · Cited by 347
A Systematic Review of Telemonitoring for the Management of Heart Failure
Louis, A. A., Turner, T., Gretton, M., Baksh, A., & Cleland, J. G. F. (2003) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00160-0 · Cited by 255 · cited 1×
“This technology originated in the 1970s, when transtelephonic monitoring was introduced,(7) and the first pacemaker that could be remotely monitored using telephone lines, cable networks, and/or broadband was introduced at the beginning of the 21 century.(8) Transtelephonic monitoring was able to supply basic informat…”
BackgroundClinical Benefits of Remote Versus Transtelephonic Monitoring of Implanted Pacemakers
Crossley, G. H., Chen, J., Choucair, W., Cohen, T. J., Gohn, D. C., Johnson, W. B., Kennedy, E. E., Mongeon, L. R., Serwer, G. A., Qiao, H., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001 · Cited by 202
Raatikainen, M. J. P., Uusimaa, P., van Ginneken, M. M. E., Janssen, J. P. G., & Linnaluoto, M. (2008) · Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eun203 · Cited by 189
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Tarride, 2009, A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease, Can J Cardiol., 25, e195, 10.1016/S0828-282X(09)70098-4 · DOI
- Dubner, 2012, ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), Europace., 14, 278, 10.1093/europace/eur303 · DOI
- Osca, 2009, Fiabilidad técnica y seguridad clínica de un sistema de monitorización remota de dispositivos cardiacos antiarrítmicos, Rev Esp Cardiol., 62, 886, 10.1016/S0300-8932(09)72071-8 · DOI
- Al-Razzo, 2011, Seguimiento domiciliario como sustitutivo de seguimiento presencial en pacientes portadores de marcapasos, Cuadernos de Estimulación Cardiaca., 4, 57
- Burri, 2011, Remote monitoring: a cost or an investment?, Europace., 13, 44, 10.1093/europace/eur082 · DOI
- López-Bastida, 2010, Propuesta de guía para la evaluación económica aplicada a las tecnologías sanitarias, Gac Sanit., 24, 154, 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.07.011 · DOI
- Shaw, 1981, Telephone monitoring of patients with pacemakers in the west of Scotland, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)., 283, 127, 10.1136/bmj.283.6284.127 · DOI
- Vincent, 1997, Diagnostic and cost effectiveness of telemonitoring the pediatric pacemaker patient, Pediatr Cardiol., 18, 86, 10.1007/s002469900121 · DOI
- Pang, 2010, Effectiveness and feasibility of a transtelephonic monitoring program: implications for a time of crisis, Int J Cardiol., 145, 529, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.061 · DOI
- Halimi, 2008, Optimized post-operative surveillance of permanent pacemakers by home monitoring: the OEDIPE trial, Europace., 10, 1392, 10.1093/europace/eun250 · DOI
- Folino, 2012, In-home controls of pacemakers in debilitated elderly patients, Geriatr Gerontol Int., 12, 30, 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00723.x · DOI
- Folino, 2013, Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients, Europace., 15, 382, 10.1093/europace/eus351 · DOI
- Perl, 2013, Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial), Int J Cardiol., 169, 402, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.019 · DOI
- Crossley, 2011, The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts, J Am Coll Cardiol., 57, 1181, 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Varma, 2010, Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial, Circulation., 122, 325, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409 · DOI · Paper page
- Guédon-Moreau, 2013, A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial, Eur Heart J., 34, 605, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs425 · DOI
- López-Villegas, 2015, Efectividad comparativa del seguimiento remoto a personas con marcapasos cardíacos frente al convencional: calidad de vida a los 6 meses, Rev Esp Salud Pública., 89, 149, 10.4321/S1135-57272015000200004 · DOI
- Halimi, 2010, Remote monitoring for active cardiovascular implantable electronic devices; a European survey, Europace., 12, 1778, 10.1093/europace/euq399 · DOI
- Elsner, 2006, A prospective multicenter comparison trial of home monitoring against regular follow-up in MADIT II patients: additional visits and cost impact, Comput Cardiol., 33, 241
- Fauchier, 2005, Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assited long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol., 28, 255, 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00071.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eze, N. D., Mateus, C., & Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi, T. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237585 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- López-Villegas, A., Catalán-Matamoros, D., Martín-Saborido, C., Villegas-Tripiana, I., & Robles-Musso, E.
- Affiliations
- Nordland Hospital Trust (NO)
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- Hospital de Poniente (ES)
- Corresponding author
- López-Villegas, Antonio
- Venue
- Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-133
- ISSN
- 1885-5857 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100928207
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- cardiac pacemaker, telemedicine, economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness, atrioventricular block, hospital monitoring, length of hospital stay, hospital visits, quality of life, adverse events, resource utilization (health care), older adults, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, remote patient monitoring, follow-up costs, hospitalization reduction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Pacemaker, Artificial, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Hospital Costs, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
