Cited by 526Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationECG Monitoring and Analysis

The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) Trial

Open access
Crossley, George H., Boyle, Andrew, Vitense, Holly, Chang, Yanping, Mead, R. Hardwin·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The primary objective was to determine if wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts reduces the time from a clinical event to a clinical decision in response to arrhythmias, cardiovascular (CV) disease progression, and device issues compared to patients receiving standard in-office care. A secondary objective was to compare the rates of CV health care utilization between patients in the remote and in-office arms. Background In addition to providing life-saving therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators collect advanced diagnostics on the progression of the patient's heart disease. Device technology has progressed to allow wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts to replace some scheduled in-office visits. Methods The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized evaluation involving 1,997 patients from 136 clinical sites who underwent insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (including cardiac resynchronization therapy devices) and were followed up for 15 months. Health care utilization data included all CV-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and clinic office visits. Results The median time from clinical event to clinical decision per patient was reduced from 22 days in the in-office arm to 4.6 days in the remote arm (p < 0.001). The health care utilization data revealed a decrease in mean length of stay per CV hospitalization visit from 4.0 days in the in-office arm to 3.3 days in the remote arm (p = 0.002). Conclusions Wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts as compared with standard in-office follow-up significantly reduced the time to a clinical decision in response to clinical events and was associated with a significant reduction in mean length of CV hospital stay. (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision [CONNECT]; NCT00402246).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.012

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integration with EHR may come across several obstacles, including demand for budget and resources, handling sensitive information, and interoperability issues.

    “Admittedly, integration with EHR may come across several obstacles, including demand for budget and resources, handling sensitive information, and interoperability issues [33,52,118].”

    From Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Study limitations section discusses delayed activation of home monitors and clinicians not resetting alerts, while Statistical analysis discusses estimated hospitalization costs. Neither addresses obstacles to EHR integration. Searches for EHR interoperability, sensitive information, and budget or resource demands found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejec- tion fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877-83.
  2. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1539 -49.
  3. Santini M, Ricci RP, Lunati M, et al. Remote monitoring of patients with biventricular defibrillators through the CareLink system improves clinical management of arrhythmias and heart failure episodes. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol 2009;24:53-61.
  4. Capucci A, Santini M, Padeletti L, et al. Monitored atrial fibrillation duration predicts arterial embolic events in patients suffering from bradycardia and atrial fibrillation implanted with antitachycardia pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1913-20.
  5. Bala R, Callans D. The management of atrial fibrillation in heart failure. Curr Treatment Options Cardiovasc Med 2010;8:325-33.
  6. Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1357-65.
  7. Purerfellner H, Gillis AM, Holbrook R, Hettrick DA. Accuracy of atrial tachyarrhythmia detection in implantable devices with arrhyth- mia therapies. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:983-92.
  8. Passman RS, Weinberg KM, Freher M, et al. Accuracy of mode switch algorithms for detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardio- vasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:773-7.
  9. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guide- lines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:854 -906.
  10. Crossley G, Boyle A, Vitense H, Sherfesee L, Mead RH. Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision (CONNECT) study. Am Heart J 2008;156:840 -6.
  11. Lawless J. Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Can J Stat 1987;15:209 -25.
  12. Varma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Love C, for the TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote mon- itoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial. Circulation 2010;122:325-32.
  13. Crossley GH, Chen J, Choucair W, et al. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2012-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crossley, G. H., Boyle, A., Vitense, H., Chang, Y., & Mead, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Saint Thomas Health (US)
  • Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center (US)
  • Medtronic (United States) (US)
  • Sequoia Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Crossley, George H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
1181-1189
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2183607324
Cited by
526
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 45
FWCI
37.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medtronic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, wireless remote monitoring, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiovascular hospitalization, length of hospital stay, health care utilization, cardiac resynchronization therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Cardiovascular Diseases, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Telemetry, Time Factors, Defibrillators, Implantable, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review