Cited by 70Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Public education financing, earnings inequality, and intergenerational mobility

Herrington, Christopher M.·2015·Review of Economic Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.red.2015.07.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consistent with the Great Gatsby curve, social mobility is higher in Norway, a fact that is matched by the quantitative model.

    “Consistent with the Great Gatsby curve, social mobility is higher in Norway, a fact that is matched by the quantitative model.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Herrington (2015)

  • Herrington finds that taxation and public education spending policies account for about one-third of the difference in income inequality and 14 percent in social mobility.

    “Herrington uses the model to examine the role of taxation and public education spending policies in generating the Great Gatsby curve, and finds that these policy dimensions account for about one-third of the difference in income inequality and 14 percent in social mobility.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Herrington (2015)

  • Spending on early childhood education has a powerful impact on educational inequality, and also amplifies the effect of other policies.

    “Spending on early childhood education turns out to have a powerful impact on educational inequality, and also amplifies the effect of other policies.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Herrington (2015)

  • These studies agree that economic inequality and social mobility are closely linked through the determination of investments in the skill acquisition process.

    “These studies agree on the basic insight that economic inequality and social mobility are closely linked through the determination of investments in the skill acquisition process, along the lines of our stylized model.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Herrington (2015)

  • These studies point to the importance of the timing of investments in skills and public education funding.

    “In addition, they all point to the importance of the timing of investments in skills and public education funding, which we will further discuss in Sections 3.5, 3.6, and 3.8 below.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Herrington (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrington, C. M.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Herrington, Christopher M.
Venue
Review of Economic Dynamics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
822-842
ISSN
1094-2025 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1566778859
Cited by
70
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Economic Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
school finance, wage inequality, intergenerational mobility, labor taxation, early childhood education, overlapping generations model, fiscal policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review