Cited by 69Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityClimate Change Policy and Economics

Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey

Köne, Aylin Çiğdem, Büke, Tayfun·2019·Renewable Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.099

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Köne, A. Ç., & Büke, T.
Affiliations
Muğla University (TR)
Corresponding author
Büke, Tayfun
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
133
Pages
914-918
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898361600
Cited by
69
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
CO2 emissions, fossil fuel combustion, emission decomposition, carbon intensity, energy mix, energy intensity, population effects, IPCC climate scenarios, climate change mitigation, Turkey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review