Cited by 139Renewable Energy and SustainabilityInnovation Policy and R&DRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

Fostering innovation in renewable energy technologies: Choice of policy instruments and effectiveness

Open access
Pitelis, Alkis, Vasilakos, Nicholas, Chalvatzis, Konstantinos·2020·Renewable Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.100

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Demand-pull policy instruments are more effective in driving renewable energy innovation compared to alternative policy types.

    “the study suggested that demand-pull policy instruments are more effective in driving renewable energy innovation compared to alternative policy types (Pitelis et al. 2019).”

    From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Pitelis et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bailey, D., Cowling, K. & Tomlinson, P. eds., 2015. New Perspectives on Industrial Policy for a Modern Britain. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
  2. De Propris L. (eds.), Handbook on Industrial Districts, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  3. Grafström, J. & Lindmand, A., 2017. Invention, Innovationm and Diffusion in the European Wind Power Sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 179-191.
  4. OECD, 2001. Using Patent Counts for Cross-Country Comparisons of Technology Outputs. STI Review No. 27, pp. 129-146.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitelis, A., Vasilakos, N., & Chalvatzis, K.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Vasilakos, Nicholas
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
151
Pages
1163-1172
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990906041
Cited by
139
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
renewable energy policy, policy effectiveness, demand-pull policy, patent counts, electric utilities, wind energy, solar energy, geothermal energy, OECD countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review