Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 62Icing and De-icing TechnologiesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicitynanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An exploratory study on using Slippery-Liquid-Infused-Porous-Surface (SLIPS) for wind turbine icing mitigation

Open access

Abstract

Abstract An experimental study was conducted to explore the potentials of using a Slippery-Liquid-Infused-Porous-Surface (SLIPS) for wind turbine icing mitigation. The SLIPS was prepared by infusing a lubricant oil into a nanofibrous membrane, which can stick firmly to the surface of a turbine blade model. While the SLIPS was found to effectively suppress impact ice accretion on the blade surface where strong aerodynamic forces are exerted, ice was still found to accrete in the vicinity of the blade stagnation line where aerodynamic forces are at their minimum. A novel hybrid anti-/de-icing strategy to integrate the SLIPS with a minimized leading-edge heating was demonstrated to effectively remove the ice accretion over entire blade surface. An comprehensive experimental study was also performed to evaluate the durability of the SLIPS to resist wearing away of the substrate materials and depletion of the infused lubricant oil due to “rain erosion” effects, in considering its practical usage for wind turbine icing mitigation. It was found that the “rain erosion” effects would induce significant surface wettability degradation, substantial ice adhesion increment and even structural failures to the SLIPS as the duration of the rain erosion testing increases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.013

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kim, 2012, Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance, ACS Nano, 6, 6569, 10.1021/nn302310q · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lv, 2014, Bio-inspired strategies for anti-icing, ACS Nano, 8, 3152, 10.1021/nn406522n · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Ma, L., Zhang, Z., Gao, L., Liu, Y., & Hu, H.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hu, Hui
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
162
Pages
2344-2360
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091979561
Cited by
62
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces, wind turbine icing, ice accretion, turbine blades, anti-icing, de-icing, nanofibrous membranes, leading edge heating, rainfall erosion, ice adhesion, surface durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exploratory study on using Slippery-Liquid-Infused-Porous-Surface (SLIPS) for wind turbine icing mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.013
The paper
Ma, L., Zhang, Z., Gao, L., Liu, Y., & Hu, H. (2020). An exploratory study on using Slippery-Liquid-Infused-Porous-Surface (SLIPS) for wind turbine icing mitigation. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.