The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: New evidence with the panel threshold model
Open accessAbstract
The increased concerns over climate change led to a large body of literature that examined the impact of energy and economic growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per capita. The majority of the existing studies employed various linear panel estimation techniques ignoring the potential nonlinear effects of energy and income on CO2 emissions per capita. To fill this gap, this study uses panel data consisting of 97 countries between 1995 and 2015 and examines the nonlinear impact of renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth on CO2 emissions per capita by using a dynamic panel threshold model that is robust to cross-section dependence. Our findings indicate the effect of growth in renewable energy consumption per capita on the growth of CO2 emissions per capita is negative and significant if countries surpass a certain threshold of renewable energy consumption. This finding mainly holds for developed countries and countries with stronger institutions and is robust to the use of an alternative proxy for renewable energy consumption. Our findings highlight the fact that increased renewable energy consumption would only reduce CO2 emissions per capita if and only if countries surpass a certain threshold of renewable energy consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3914 · Cited by 7,595
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631 · Cited by 7,460
Unit root tests for panel data
Choi, I. (2001) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6 · Cited by 4,113
Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels
Pesaran, M. H. (2015) · Econometric Reviews · doi:10.1080/07474938.2014.956623 · Cited by 2,950
Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation
Hansen, B. E. (2000) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00124 · Cited by 2,874
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C., Pinar, M., & Stengos, T.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 117-128
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281259700
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 40.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: New evidence with the panel threshold model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.095
- The paper
- Chen, C., Pinar, M., & Stengos, T. (2022). Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: New evidence with the panel threshold model. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.