The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recycling of wastewaters of textile dyeing industries using advanced treatment technology and cost analysis—Case studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Textile effluent is commonly subjected to evaporation through two primary methods, namely solar evaporation and mechanical evaporation [195,236].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [236]
In the citing paper
“NF is a very sophisticated membrane-based technique that demonstrates remarkable efficacy in the removal of heavy metals [236][237][238].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [236]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Annual Report 2003–2004, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, 2004, pp. 21–22.
- Bucklay, 1992, Membrane technology for the treatment of dye house effluents, Water Sci. Technol., 25, 203, 10.2166/wst.1992.0248 · DOI
- Ciardelli, 2000, Membrane separation for wastewater reuse in the textile industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 31, 189, 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00079-3 · DOI
- Rajaguru, 2002, Genotoxicity evaluation of polluted ground water in human peripheral blood lymphocytes using comet assay, Mutat. Res., 517, 29, 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00025-6 · DOI
- Vandevivere, 1998, Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: review of emerging technology, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 72, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::AID-JCTB905>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes
Clarke, C. J., Tu, W.-C., Levers, O., Bröhl, A., & Hallett, J. P. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00571 · Cited by 2,071
Degradation of dyes from aqueous solution by Fenton processes: a review
Nidheesh, P. V., Gandhimathi, R., & Ramesh, S. T. (2013) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1385-z · Cited by 696
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Current Technologies for Biological Treatment of Textile Wastewater—A Review
Sarayu, K., & Sandhya, S. (2012) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-012-9716-6 · Cited by 420
Study on optimizing production scheduling for water-saving in textile dyeing industry
Zhou, L., Xu, K., Cheng, X., Xu, Y., & Jia, Q. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.047 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranganathan, K., Karunagaran, K., & Sharma, D. C.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-318
- ISSN
- 0921-3449
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
