The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries
Abstract
Abstract The developing countries are facing huge challenges in the management of electronic waste (e-waste) which are either internally generated or imported illegally as ‘used’ goods in an attempt to bridge the so-called ‘digital divide’. E-waste contains hazardous constituents that may negatively impact the environment and affect human health if not properly managed. In these countries, because of lack of adequate infrastructure to manage wastes safely, these wastes are buried, burnt in the open air or dumped into surface water bodies. Crude ‘backyard’ recycling practices, which are not efficient and are highly polluting are also used in material recovery activities. Most developed countries have in place legislation mandating electronic manufacturers and importers to take-back used electronic products at their end-of-life (EoL) based on the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR). In this paper, we review the concept of EPR, and discuss selected frameworks. The aim has been to find a mid point for the implementation of even an ‘abridged’ form of EPR in the developing countries. Implementation of EPR in the developing countries has become necessary in the light of the present high level of trans-boundary movement of e-waste into the developing countries and the lack of basic or state-of-the-art recycling and waste disposal facilities. Change in attitude by governments, appropriate legislation dealing specifically with e-waste, control of electronic waste dumping, implementation of EPR and transfer of technology on sound recycling of e-waste are the key issues in effective management of e-waste in developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?
Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Gauglhofer, J. (2005) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.003 · Cited by 301
Darby, L., & Obara, L. (2005) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.002 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues
Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16061060 · Cited by 2,293
Aqueous metal recovery techniques from e-scrap: Hydrometallurgy in recycling
Tuncuk, A., Stazi, V., Akcil, A., Yazici, E. Y., & Deveci, H. (2012) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.019 · Cited by 773
Electric vehicle battery technologies: From present state to future systems
Manzetti, S., & Mariasiu, F. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.010 · Cited by 533
Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil
Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064 · Cited by 509
Determinants of residents' E-waste recycling behavioral intention: a case study from Vietnam
Thi Thu Nguyen, H., Hung, R.-J., Lee, C.-H., & Thi Thu Nguyen, H. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11010164 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Nnorom, I. C., & Osibanjo, O.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 843-858
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022323093
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.01.004
- The paper
- Nnorom, I. C., & Osibanjo, O. (2008). Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.