The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, according to Chileshe et al., (2018), da Rocha and Sattler (2009), Dunant et al. (2017), Gorgolewski et al. (2008), Klang et al. (2003) and MacKinnon (2000), the lower price of the reused components can contribute to the cost savings in the construction projects.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler (2009)
In the citing paper
“and increases the revenue from the resale of these components (Dantata et al., 2005; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Dunant et al., 2017; Klang et al., 2003; Sea-Lim et al., 2018)”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“which in the long run supports the growth of a reuse market (Chileshe et al., 2018; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Tingley et al., 2017)”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“However, according to a few articles, informality and good relationships among the stakeholders are reported to help overcome this challenge and promote reuse (Chileshe et al., 2016b; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Shaurette, 2006).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“This factor, which is partially the outcome of the tight project schedules (Tatiya et al., 2017), results in the lack of sufficient supply of reused components with the desired characteristics (dimension, quality, etc.) (Brütting et al., 2019; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Dunant et al., 2017; Gorgolewski, 2008; Rose and Stegemann, 2018; Tingley et al., 2017).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“Consequently, this practise may raise cash flow problems and increase the overall cost of the project due to additional storage costs, which is another barrier to the BCR (Chinda and Ammarapala, 2016; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Gorgolewski, 2008; Gorgolewski et al., 2008; Yeung et al., 2015 (among others)).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“According to this study, in Brazil, the cost of deconstruction is lower than demolition due to the low cost of manual labour and the high demand for demolition products (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“Damages to the reused building components can decrease the quality of the elements and affect their reusability (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Durão et al., 2014; Huuhka and Hakanen, 2015; Tatiya et al., 2017).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“The occupational health concerns (Klang et al., 2003, Rameezdeen et al., 2016), liability and fear (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009), lack of trust to the supplier of the reused components (Dunant et al., 2017, 2018) and unsatisfactory working environment during the treatment of the reused components (Klang et al., 2003) can all worsen the lack of interest to integrate the reused components in the proj”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
In the citing paper
“However, there are reports of illegal landfilling in reaction to the increased landfilling taxes (da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Rameezdeen et al., 2016).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as da Rocha and Sattler, 2009
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77282-0_6 · Cited by 17,411
Issues in Supply Chain Management
Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00113-3 · Cited by 3,107
Chatzopoulou, E. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003107774-12 · Cited by 1,585
Cooper, M. C., & Ellram, L. M. (1993) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574099310804957 · Cited by 1,037
The four roles of supply chain management in construction
Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2000) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00013-7 · Cited by 861
Thormark, C. (2002) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/s0360-1323(01)00033-6 · Cited by 675
Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment
Hill, R. C., & Bowen, P. A. (1997) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461997372971 · Cited by 610
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Angulo SC. Caracterização de Agregados de Resíduos de Construção e Demolição Reciclados e a Influência de suas Características no Comportamento de Concretos [Characterization of aggregate of construction and demolition residues and their characteristics in the concrete behavior]. Ph.D. thesis, Sao Paulo, Brazil: Sao Paulo University, Polytechnic School; 2005.
- Pinto TP. Metodologia para a gestão diferenciada de resíduos sólidos da construção urbana [Methodology for differential management of solid residues of urban construction]. Ph.D. thesis, São Paulo, Brazil: São Paulo University, Polytechnic School; 1999.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017)
Tam, V. W. Y., Soomro, M., & Evangelista, A. C. J. (2018) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.240 · Cited by 1,334
Material efficiency: A white paper
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2011) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · Cited by 927
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings2020126 · Cited by 658
Jin, R., Yuan, H., & Chen, Q. (2018) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.029 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- da Rocha, C. G., & Sattler, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-112
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966823554
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- reuse of architectural elements, construction and demolition waste, supply chain management, sustainable construction, Porto Alegre
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review