Cited by 116Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessService and Product Innovation

Closing the loop on circular economy research: From theory to practice and back again

Babbitt, Callie W., Gaustad, Gabrielle, Fisher, Angela, Chen, Wei-Qiang, Liu, Gang·2018·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babbitt, C. W., Gaustad, G., Fisher, A., Chen, W.-Q., & Liu, G.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Babbitt, Callie W.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
135
Pages
1-2
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802074150
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
circular economy, sustainable services, service organizations, institutional factors, contextual factors, strategic factors, service sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review