Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some wood-based products-for instance, formworks, pallets, wood-frame structures, beams, window framing, and doors-are reused in the building sector.
“Some wood-based products-for instance, formworks, pallets, wood-frame structures, beams, window framing, and doors-are reused in the building sector [78].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The prefabrication technique could reduce timber waste from 65% to 80%.
“The literature highlighted that the prefabrication technique could reduce timber waste from 65% to 80% [78,86].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The average recycling rate in the EU, UK, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, US, and China are 46%, 89.9%, 47.5%, 37.9%, 34%, 38-40%, 70%, and 5%, respectively.
“The average recycling rate in the EU, UK, France, Spain, Germany, Australia, US, and China are 46%, 89.9%, 47.5%, 37.9%, 34%, 38-40%, 70%, and 5%, respectively [78,80,97,98].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Rahla, K. M., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L. (2021) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures6040049 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Mahboob, A., Hassanshahi, O., Safi, M., & Majid, T. A. (2024) · Advanced Composite Materials · doi:10.1080/09243046.2024.2322799 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gálvez-Martos, J.-L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., & Zeschmar-Lahl, B.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 166-178
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799868038
- Cited by
- 816
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 7 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 53.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- construction and demolition waste, best management practices, circular economy, waste management policy, construction value chain, resource efficiency, waste reduction, secondary raw materials, recycling, reuse, waste transportation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
