Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 667

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud

Khairul, M.A., Zanganeh, Jafar, Moghtaderi, Behdad·2019·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Abstract Red mud or bauxite residue is a solid waste generated from the Bayer process. The disposal of red mud leads to a serious environmental threat because of its tiny particle size and high alkaline value. The utilisation and recycling of red mud is currently a crucial issue and needs to be addressed as soon as possible. This study demonstrates the different methods and techniques recently analysed or suggested for the consumption of bulk red mud to maintain a sustainable environment. The potential utilisations of red mud include valuable metal recovery, the preparation of construction materials and as an alternative catalyst for diverse processes, including hydrodechlorination, hydrogenation and hydrocarbon oxidation. In addition, the red mud can also be used to control environmental pollution, such as in wastewater treatment, soil remediation and the purification of flue gas. However, the proper utilisation and recycling of red mud has a number of shortcomings: pyro-metallurgical recovery involves high energy costs; large volumes of acid by-product needing to be neutralised after the leaching process; the fine particle size of red mud; and the necessity of pre-treatment in some methods. Although many studies have investigated the potential utilisation of red mud, most of them have concentrated on lab-scale studies. Therefore, a large-scale investigation of the recycling and utilisation of red mud needs to be explored. Moreover, an appropriate cost-benefit analysis of the existing technologies needs to be examined in the future because of the high cost of the transportation of a large amount of red mud from alumina refineries to the point of application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.006

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 667

Metadata

Authors
Khairul, M. A., Zanganeh, J., & Moghtaderi, B.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
141
Pages
483-498
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900783051
Cited by
667
References
63
FWCI
25.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.006
The paper
Khairul, M. A., Zanganeh, J., & Moghtaderi, B. (2019). The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.