The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on the circular economy: A critique of the field
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, this design addresses the criticism by Kirchherr and van Santen (2019) regarding a lack of medium and large N-sample research in the contemporary CE literature.”
From Stakeholder governance to facilitate collaboration for a systemic circular economy transition: A qualitative study in the European chemicals and plastics industry (2024) · cites this paper as Kirchherr and van Santen (2019)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ali, 2019, Facilitating industrial symbiosis to achieve circular economy using value-added by design: a case study in transforming the automobile industry sheet metal waste- flow into Voronoi facade systems, J. Clean. Prod., 234, 1033, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.202 · DOI
- Fratini, 2019, Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: a research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 974, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193 · DOI · Paper page
- Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy e A new sustainability paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 2011, Ecological utilization of leather tannery waste with circular economy model, J. Clean. Prod., 19, 221, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.018 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hofstetter, J. S., De Marchi, V., Sarkis, J., Govindan, K., Klassen, R., Ometto, A. R., Spraul, K. S., Bocken, N., Ashton, W. S., Sharma, S., et al. (2021) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00015-2 · Cited by 174
Schultz, F. C., Valentinov, V., Kirchherr, J., Reinhardt, R. J., & Pies, I. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3592 · Cited by 82
Self-citationBoldrini, J.-C., & Antheaume, N. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127209 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirchherr, J., & van Santen, R.
- ORCID
- Kirchherr, Julian
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 104480
- ISSN
- 0921-3449
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
