The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely used for assessing the environmental impacts of a product or service. Collecting reliable data is a major challenge in LCA due to the complexities involved in the tracking and quantifying inputs and outputs at multiple supply chain stages. Blockchain technology offers an ideal solution to overcome the challenge in sustainable supply chain management. Its use in combination with internet-of-things (IoT) and big data analytics and visualization can help organizations achieve operational excellence in conducting LCA for improving supply chain sustainability. This research develops a framework to guide the implementation of Blockchain-based LCA. It proposes a system architecture that integrates the use of Blockchain, IoT, and big data analytics and visualization. The proposed implementation framework and system architecture were validated by practitioners who were experienced with Blockchain applications. The research also analyzes system implementation costs and discusses potential issues and solutions, as well as managerial and policy implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Wright, C. S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 13,922
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 · Cited by 4,104
(2015) · Cited by 3,471
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema, B. P., & Pennington, D. W. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005 · Cited by 2,753 · cited 4×
“It involves the critical review, determination of data sensitivity, and communication of results (Rebitzer et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialCorporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors
Flammer, C. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0744 · Cited by 1,744
(2017) · Cited by 1,724
Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., & Rydberg, T. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es101316v · Cited by 1,692
Cited by
Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0
Esmaeilian, B., Sarkis, J., Lewis, K., & Behdad, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064 · Cited by 855
Lai, X., Chen, Q., Tang, X., Zhou, Y., Gao, F., Guo, Y., Bhagat, R., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169 · Cited by 566
Khan, S. A. R., Razzaq, A., Yu, Z., & Miller, S. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2853 · Cited by 404
RetractedBerger, K., Schöggl, J.-P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131492 · Cited by 216
Blockchain for public services: a systematic literature review.
Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., Diaz-Fuentes, D., & Fernandez-Gutierrez, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3052019 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, A., Zhong, R. Y., Farooque, M., Kang, K., & Venkatesh, V. G.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 152
- Pages
- 104512
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2977368620
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 39.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104512
- The paper
- Zhang, A., Zhong, R. Y., Farooque, M., Kang, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2020). Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: An implementation framework and system architecture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
