CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 566Environmental Impact and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation ProcessesElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Critical review of life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: A lifespan perspective

Lai, Xin, Chen, Quanwei, Tang, Xiaopeng, Zhou, Yuanqiang, Gao, Furong, Guo, Yue, Bhagat, Rohit, Zheng, Yuejiu·2022·eTransportation
DOI 10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over an assumed lifetime of 184,000 km, only Alaska and Iowa have a negative ED, although Hawaii is almost neutral.

    “Concerning ED, Figure 5 shows that over an assumed lifetime of 184,000 km [29] only Alaska and Iowa have a negative ED, although Hawaii is almost neutral”

    From A National and Regional Greenhouse Gas Breakeven Assessment of EVs across North America (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Recycling lithium batteries via direct, pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, or bio-hydrometallurgical methods all involve water.

    “There are several processes for recycling lithium batteries, including direct, pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, or bio-hydrometallurgical methods, all of which involve water (Baum et al., 2022; Lai et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2022; Swain, 2017).”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Lai et al., 2022

  • The production of battery materials and subsequent LIB cell manufacturing contribute considerably to greenhouse gas emissions.

    “the production of battery materials4–7 and the subsequent LIB cell manufacturing8–10 contribute considerably to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”

    From Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 279

  1. Falcao, 2017, Analysis of CO2 emissions and techno-economic feasibility of an electric commercial vehicle, Appl Energy, 193, 297, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.050 · DOI
  2. Bickert, 2015, Developments of CO2-emissions and costs for small electric and combustion engine vehicles in Germany, Transport Res D-Tr E., 36, 138, 10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.004 · DOI
  3. Ma, 2021, Li-ion battery recycling challenges, Inside Chem
  4. Harvey, 2020, Rethinking electric vehicle subsidies, rediscovering energy efficiency, Energy Pol, 146
  5. Zhao, 2022, Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: strategies and countermeasures, Resour Conserv Recycl, 176
  6. Lai, 2022, Remaining discharge energy estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on future load prediction considering temperature and ageing effects, Energy, 238
  7. Lu, 2013, A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles, J Power Sources, 226, 272, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chu, 2017, The path towards sustainable energy, Nat Mater, 16, 16, 10.1038/nmat4834 · DOI
  9. Miao, 2022, An overview of global power lithium-ion batteries and associated critical metal recycling, J Hazard Mater, 425
  10. Pinegar, 2019, Recycling of end-of-life lithium ion batteries, Part I: commercial processes, J Sustain Metall, 5, 402
  11. Ambrose, 2020, Understanding the future of lithium: Part 2, temporally and spatially resolved life-cycle assessment modeling, J Ind Ecol, 24
  12. Lin, 2021, The impact of electric vehicle penetration: a recursive dynamic CGE analysis of China, Energy Econ, 94
  13. Rajaeifar, 2022, Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: a sustainability perspective, Resour Conserv Recycl, 180
  14. Lai, 2021, Turning waste into wealth: a systematic review on echelon utilization and material recycling of retired lithium-ion batteries, Energy Storage Mater, 40, 96, 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.05.010 · DOI
  15. Martins, 2021, Electric car battery: an overview on global demand, recycling and future approaches towards sustainability, J Environ Manag, 295
  16. Sun, 2019, Supply risks of lithium-ion battery materials: an entire supply chain estimation, Mater Today Energy, 14
  17. Olivetti, 2017, Lithium-ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals, Joule, 1, 229, 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Harper, 2019, Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles, Nature, 575, 75, 10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Christensen, 2021, Risk management over the life cycle of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 148
  20. Gandoman, 2019, Concept of reliability and safety assessment of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles: basics, progress, and challenges, Appl Energy, 251
  21. Lai, 2021, Mechanism, modeling, detection, and prevention of the internal short circuit in lithium-ion batteries: recent advances and perspectives, Energy Storage Mater, 35, 470, 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.026 · DOI
  22. Bobba, 2019, How will second-use of batteries affect stocks and flows in the EU? A model for traction Li-ion batteries, Resour Conserv Recycl, 145, 279, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.022 · DOI
  23. Neubauer, 2011, The ability of battery second use strategies to impact plug-in electric vehicle prices and serve utility energy storage applications, J Power Sources, 196, 10351, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.053 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kamath, 2020, Economic and environmental feasibility of second-life lithium-ion batteries as fast-charging energy storage, Environ Sci Technol, 54, 6878, 10.1021/acs.est.9b05883 · DOI
  25. Kamath, 2020, Evaluating the cost and carbon footprint of second-life electric vehicle batteries in residential and utility-level applications, Waste Manag, 113, 497, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.034 · DOI
  26. Kallitsis, 2020, Environmental life cycle assessment of the production in China of lithium-ion batteries with nickel-cobalt-manganese cathodes utilising novel electrode chemistries, J Clean Prod, 254
  27. Lander, 2021, Cost and carbon footprint reduction of electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries through efficient thermal management, Appl Energy, 289
  28. Sun, 2020, Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries for electric passenger vehicles, J Clean Prod, 273
  29. Notter, 2010, Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles, Environ Sci Technol, 44, 6550, 10.1021/es903729a · DOI
  30. Oliveira, 2015, Key issues of lithium-ion batteries - from resource depletion to environmental performance indicators, J Clean Prod, 108, 354, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.021 · DOI
  31. Kim, 2016, Cradle-to-Gate emissions from a commercial electric vehicle Li-ion battery: a comparative analysis, Environ Sci Technol, 50, 7715, 10.1021/acs.est.6b00830 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Dunn, 2012, Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries, Environ Sci Technol, 46, 12704, 10.1021/es302420z · DOI
  33. Cooney, 2013, Life cycle assessment of diesel and electric public transportation buses, J Ind Ecol, 17, 689, 10.1111/jiec.12024 · DOI
  34. Wang, 2021, A comparative life cycle assessment on lithium-ion battery: case study on electric vehicle battery in China considering battery evolution, Waste Manag Res, 39, 156, 10.1177/0734242X20966637 · DOI
  35. Melin, 2021, Global implications of the EU battery regulation, Science, 373, 384, 10.1126/science.abh1416 · DOI
  36. Tagliaferri, 2016, Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: a cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach, Chem Eng Res Des, 112, 298, 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hiremath, 2015, Comparative life cycle assessment of battery storage systems for stationary applications, Environ Sci Technol, 49, 4825, 10.1021/es504572q · DOI
  38. Hellweg, 2014, Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment, Science, 344, 1109, 10.1126/science.1248361 · DOI
  39. Finnveden, 2009, Recent developments in life cycle assessment, J Environ Manag, 91, 1
  40. Guinee, 2011, Life cycle assessment: past, present, and futures, Environ Sci Technol, 45, 90, 10.1021/es101316v · DOI
  41. Pennington, 2004, Life cycle assessment Part 2: current impact assessment practice, Environ Int, 30, 721, 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.009 · DOI
  42. Bolin, 2011, Life cycle assessment of pentachlorophenol-treated wooden utility poles with comparisons to steel and concrete utility poles, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15, 2475, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.019 · DOI
  43. Cho, 2012, LCA application in the optimum design of high rise steel structures, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 3146, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.076 · DOI
  44. Guinee, 2017, Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials, Nat Nanotechnol, 12, 727, 10.1038/nnano.2017.135 · DOI
  45. Islam, 2015, Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings-A review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 42, 129, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.006 · DOI
  46. Chauhan, 2011, Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: a review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15, 3445, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.033 · DOI
  47. Gonzalez-Garcia, 2009, Life cycle assessment of flax shives derived second generation ethanol fueled automobiles in Spain, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 13, 1922, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.02.003 · DOI
  48. Rashedi, 2013, Life cycle assessment of 50 MW wind firms and strategies for impact reduction, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 21, 89, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.045 · DOI
  49. Ghandehariun, 2016, Life cycle assessment of wind-based hydrogen production in Western Canada, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 41, 9696, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.077 · DOI
  50. Tannous, 2018, Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of traditional grid connected and solar stand-alone street light systems: a case study for rural areas in Lebanon, J Clean Prod, 186, 963, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.155 · DOI
  51. Yay, 2015, Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya, J Clean Prod, 94, 284, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089 · DOI
  52. Farjana, 2019, Life cycle assessment of cobalt extraction process, J Sustain Mining, 18, 150
  53. Memary, 2012, Life cycle assessment: a time-series analysis of copper, J Clean Prod, 33, 97, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.025 · DOI
  54. Chiaramonti, 2015, Life cycle assessment of algae biofuels: needs and challenges, Appl Energy, 154, 1049, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.006 · DOI
  55. Ubando, 2019, A comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) of microalgal and lignocellulosic bioenergy products from thermochemical processes, Bioresour Technol, 291
  56. Bartolozzi, 2013, Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: a case study in Tuscany, Italy, Appl Energy, 101, 103, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.021 · DOI
  57. Samaras, 2008, Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy, Environ Sci Technol, 42, 3170, 10.1021/es702178s · DOI
  58. Frischknecht, 2011, Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges-Zurich, April 6, 2011, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 16, 691, 10.1007/s11367-011-0306-6 · DOI
  59. Faria, 2013, Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 24, 271, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.063 · DOI
  60. Girardi, 2015, A comparative LCA of an electric vehicle and an internal combustion engine vehicle using the appropriate power mix: the Italian case study, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 20, 1127, 10.1007/s11367-015-0903-x · DOI
  61. Kannangara, 2021, An adaptable life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment framework for electric, hybrid, fuel cell and conventional vehicles: effect of electricity mix, mileage, battery capacity and battery chemistry in the context of Canada, J Clean Prod, 317
  62. Onat, 2018, Well-to-wheel water footprints of conventional versus electric vehicles in the United States: a state-based comparative analysis, J Clean Prod, 204, 788, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.010 · DOI
  63. Wang, 2018, Environmental impact analysis and process optimization of batteries based on life cycle assessment, J Clean Prod, 174, 1262, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.059 · DOI
  64. Wu, 2018, Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries with lithium metal, silicon nanowire, and graphite anodes, Clean Technol Envir, 20, 1233, 10.1007/s10098-018-1548-9 · DOI
  65. Chigada, 2021, Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion capacitors production from primary ore and recycled minerals using LCA to balance environmental, economic and social performance in early phase research and development, Johnson Matthey Tech, 65, 469, 10.1595/205651321X16165776867357 · DOI
  66. Melzack, 2021, Cleaner energy storage: cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of aluminum-ion batteries with an aqueous electrolyte, Front Energy Res, 9, 10.3389/fenrg.2021.699919 · DOI
  67. Wang, 2020, Lithium-air, lithium-sulfur, and sodium-ion, which secondary battery category is more environmentally friendly and promising based on footprint family indicators?, J Clean Prod, 276
  68. Wang, 2017, Quantifying the environmental impact of a Li-rich high-capacity cathode material in electric vehicles via life cycle assessment, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 24, 1251, 10.1007/s11356-016-7849-9 · DOI
  69. Zackrisson, 2010, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles - critical issues, J Clean Prod, 18, 1519, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Le Varlet, 2020, Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery chemistries for residential storage, J Energy Storage, 28
  71. Deng, 2017, Life cycle assessment of high capacity molybdenum disulfide lithium ion battery for electric vehicles, Energy, 123, 77, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.096 · DOI
  72. Rajaeifar, 2021, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies, J Ind Ecol, 10.1111/jiec.13157 · DOI
  73. Zhang, 2021, Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of cobalt sulfate production derived from a nickel-copper-cobalt mine in China, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 1198, 10.1007/s11367-021-01925-x · DOI · Paper page
  74. Rinne, 2021, Life cycle assessment and process simulation of prospective battery-grade cobalt sulfate production from Co-Au ores in Finland, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10.1007/s11367-021-01965-3 · DOI
  75. Chordia, 2021, Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10.1007/s11367-021-01976-0 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Hao, 2017, GHG emissions from the production of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles in China, Sustainability-Basel, 9
  77. Kelly, 2020, Globally regional life cycle analysis of automotive lithium-ion nickel manganese cobalt batteries, Mitig Adapt Strat Gl, 25, 371, 10.1007/s11027-019-09869-2 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Cusenza, 2019, Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, J Clean Prod, 215, 634, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.056 · DOI
  79. Yuan, 2021, Water-based manufacturing of lithium ion battery for life cycle impact mitigation, CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol, 70, 25, 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.038 · DOI
  80. Peters, 2017, The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters - a review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 67, 491, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Sun, 2020, Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries for electric passenger vehicles, J Clean Prod, 273
  82. Wu, 2021, The environmental footprint of electric vehicle battery packs during the production and use phases with different functional units, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 97, 10.1007/s11367-020-01836-3 · DOI
  83. Mohr, 2020, Toward a cell-chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery recycling processes, J Ind Ecol, 24, 1310, 10.1111/jiec.13021 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Anwani, 2020, Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of acidic leaching and baking routes for the production of cobalt oxalate from spent lithium-ion batteries, J Mater Cycles Waste, 22, 2092, 10.1007/s10163-020-01095-2 · DOI
  85. Yang, 2020, Environmental feasibility of secondary use of electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries in communication base stations, Resour Conserv Recycl, 156, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104713 · DOI
  86. Xiong, 2020, Environmental and economic evaluation of remanufacturing lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles, Waste Manag, 102, 579, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.013 · DOI
  87. Unterreiner, 2016, Recycling of battery technologies - ecological impact analysis using life cycle assessment (LCA), Enrgy Proced, 99, 229, 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.113 · DOI
  88. Wang, 2017, Carbon footprint analysis of lithium ion secondary battery industry: two case studies from China, J Clean Prod, 163, 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.057 · DOI
  89. Liang, 2017, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for greenhouse gas emissions, Resour Conserv Recycl, 117, 285, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.028 · DOI
  90. Ellingsen, 2017, Identifying key assumptions and differences in life cycle assessment studies of lithium-ion traction batteries with focus on greenhouse gas emissions, Transport Res D-Tr E., 55, 82, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.028 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Lai, 2021, Sorting, regrouping, and echelon utilization of the large-scale retired lithium batteries: a critical review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 146
  92. Raugei, 2020, What are the energy and environmental impacts of adding battery storage to photovoltaics? A generalized life cycle assessment, Energy Technol-Ger., 8
  93. Liu, 2021, Life cycle assessment of power batteries used in electric bicycles in China, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 139
  94. Pellow, 2020, Research gaps in environmental life cycle assessments of lithium ion batteries for grid-scale stationary energy storage systems: end-of-life options and other issues, Sustain Mater Techno, 23
  95. Richa, 2015, Environmental trade-offs across cascading lithium-ion battery life cycles, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 22, 66, 10.1007/s11367-015-0942-3 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Ahmadi, 2017, A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 22, 111, 10.1007/s11367-015-0959-7 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Baumann, 2017, CO2 footprint and life-cycle costs of electrochemical energy storage for stationary grid applications, Energy Technol-Ger, 5, 1071, 10.1002/ente.201600622 · DOI
  98. Mostert, 2018, Comparing electrical energy storage technologies regarding their material and carbon footprint, Energies, 11, 10.3390/en11123386 · DOI
  99. Wu, 2021, Is solar power renewable and carbon-neutral: evidence from a pilot solar tower plant in China under a systems view, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 138
  100. Azapagic, 1999, Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation, Chem Eng J, 73, 1, 10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00042-X · DOI
  101. Finkbeiner, 2006, The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 11, 80, 10.1065/lca2006.02.002 · DOI
  102. Weidema, 2020, Life cycle assessment: quantitative approaches for decisions that matter, J Ind Ecol, 24, 726, 10.1111/jiec.12955 · DOI
  103. Klopffer, 2005, Life cycle assessment in the mirror of Int J LCA - past, present, future, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10, 379, 10.1065/lca2005.11.001 · DOI
  104. Curran, 2013, Life Cycle Assessment: a review of the methodology and its application to sustainability, Curr Opin Chem Eng, 2, 273, 10.1016/j.coche.2013.02.002 · DOI
  105. Smith, 2019, Life cycle assessment of functional materials and devices: opportunities, challenges, and current and future trends, J Am Ceram Soc, 102, 7037, 10.1111/jace.16712 · DOI
  106. Shekhar, 2022, Worldwide ubiquitous utilization of lithium-ion batteries: what we have done, are doing, and could do safely once they are dead?, J Power Sources, 523
  107. Arshad, 2022, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries: a critical review, Resour Conserv Recycl, 180
  108. Davidson, 2021, Production of HMF, FDCA and their derived products: a review of life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) studies, Green Chem, 23, 3154, 10.1039/D1GC00721A · DOI
  109. Steubing, 2021, Making the use of scenarios in LCA easier: the superstructure approach, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 2248, 10.1007/s11367-021-01974-2 · DOI
  110. Croes, 2021, The assessment of positive impacts in LCA of products, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 143, 10.1007/s11367-020-01820-x · DOI
  111. Chen, 2021, Uncertainty caused by life cycle impact assessment methods: case studies in process-based LCI databases, Resour Conserv Recycl, 172
  112. Chordia, 2021, Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 2024, 10.1007/s11367-021-01976-0 · DOI · Paper page
  113. Sun, 2022, Life cycle assessment and risk assessment of liquefied natural gas vehicles promotion, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 153
  114. Bare, 2006, Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for Life Cycle Impact Assessment and sustainability metrics, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 5108, 10.1021/es052494b · DOI
  115. Niero, 2021, Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?, J Ind Ecol, 25, 1111, 10.1111/jiec.13134 · DOI
  116. Tian, 2021, Life cycle assessment of recycling strategies for perovskite photovoltaic modules, Nat Sustain, 4, 10.1038/s41893-021-00737-z · DOI
  117. Pryshlakivsky, 2021, Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: practitioner and managerial considerations, J Clean Prod, 309
  118. Accardo, 2021, Life cycle assessment of an NMC battery for application to electric light-duty commercial vehicles and comparison with a sodium-nickel-chloride battery, Appl Sci-Basel, 11
  119. Porzio, 2021, Life-cycle assessment considerations for batteries and battery materials, Adv Energy Mater, 11, 10.1002/aenm.202100771 · DOI
  120. Iturrondobeitia, 2021, Environmental impact analysis of aprotic Li-O-2 batteries based on life cycle assessment, ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 9, 7139, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01554 · DOI
  121. Liu, 2020, Comparison of well-to-wheels energy use and emissions of a hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle relative to a conventional gasoline-powered internal combustion engine vehicle, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45, 972, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.192 · DOI
  122. Gupta, 2021, Chasing carbon: the elusive environmental footprint of computing, Int S High Perf Comp, 854
  123. Reimers, 2021, Indirect rebound effects on the consumer level: a state-of-the-art literature review, Cleaner Respon Consumpt, 3, 10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100032 · DOI · Paper page
  124. Gong, 2017, Consequential life cycle optimization: general conceptual framework and application to algal renewable diesel production, ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 5, 5887, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00631 · DOI
  125. Bamber, 2020, Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 25, 168, 10.1007/s11367-019-01663-1 · DOI
  126. Baustert, 2017, Uncertainty analysis in agent-based modelling and consequential life cycle assessment coupled models: a critical review, J Clean Prod, 156, 378, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.193 · DOI
  127. Yang, 2016, Two sides of the same coin: consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework, J Clean Prod, 127, 274, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.089 · DOI
  128. Rehl, 2012, Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—attributional vs. consequential approach, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 3766, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.072 · DOI
  129. Dastjerdi, 2021, A systematic review on life cycle assessment of different waste to energy valorization technologies, J Clean Prod, 290
  130. Laurent, 2020, Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase, J Ind Ecol, 24, 986, 10.1111/jiec.13012 · DOI
  131. Yin, 2019, Life cycle inventories of the commonly used materials for lithium-ion batteries in China, J Clean Prod, 227, 960, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.186 · DOI
  132. Mattila, 2010, Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment, Environ Sci Technol, 44, 4309, 10.1021/es902673m · DOI
  133. Crawford, 2018, Hybrid life cycle inventory methods - a review, J Clean Prod, 172, 1273, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176 · DOI
  134. Xiong, 2021, A hybrid life cycle assessment of the large-scale application of electric vehicles, Energy, 216
  135. Peters, 2006, A comment on "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model", Ecol Econ, 59, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.008 · DOI
  136. Islam, 2016, Review on life cycle inventory: methods, examples and applications, J Clean Prod, 136, 266, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.144 · DOI
  137. Suh, 2005, Methods for life cycle inventory of a product, J Clean Prod, 13, 687, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001 · DOI
  138. Ward, 2018, Truncation error estimates in process life cycle assessment using input-output analysis, J Ind Ecol, 22, 1080, 10.1111/jiec.12655 · DOI
  139. Jiang, 2019, Estimation of environmental impacts of roads through life cycle assessment: a critical review and future directions, Transport Res D-Tr E., 77, 148, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.010 · DOI
  140. Suh, 2004, System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches, Environ Sci Technol, 38, 657, 10.1021/es0263745 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Reap, 2008, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment - Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 13, 290, 10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x · DOI
  142. Shi, 2019, Economic input-output life cycle assessment of concrete pavement containing recycled concrete aggregate, J Clean Prod, 225, 414, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.288 · DOI
  143. Norman, 2007, Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of trade between Canada and the United States, Environ Sci Technol, 41, 1523, 10.1021/es060082c · DOI
  144. Yue, 2016, Integrating hybrid life cycle assessment with multiobjective optimization: a modeling framework, Environ Sci Technol, 50, 1501, 10.1021/acs.est.5b04279 · DOI
  145. Pan, 2021, A systematic investigation into the methodological variables of embodied carbon assessment of buildings, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 141
  146. Hemmati, 2022, Life cycle assessment of cross-laminated timber transportation from three origin points, Sustainability-Basel, 14
  147. Liu, 2021, Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: from the perspective of a life cycle assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 139, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110716 · DOI
  148. Woydt, 2022, Material efficiency through wear protection - the contribution of tribology for reducing CO2 emissions, Wear, 488
  149. Jia, 2021, How to achieve the first step of the carbon-neutrality 2060 target in China: the coal substitution perspective, Energy, 233
  150. Li, 2021, Assessment of greenhouse gasses and air pollutant emissions embodied in cross-province electricity trade in China, Resour Conserv Recycl, 171
  151. Selicati, 2022, Addressing heterogeneity sources in manufacturing sustainability assessment using the system design view, CIRP J Manufact Sci Technol, 37, 319, 10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.009 · DOI
  152. Khanna, 2022, Life cycle assessment of environmentally friendly initiatives for sustainable machining: a short review of current knowledge and a case study, Sustain Mater Techno, 32
  153. Zhao, 2021, Converting waste cooking oil to biodiesel in China: environmental impacts and economic feasibility, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 140
  154. Santillan-Saldivar, 2022, An improved resource midpoint characterization method for supply risk of resources: integrated assessment of Li-ion batteries, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10.1007/s11367-022-02027-y · DOI
  155. Alejandrino, 2021, Life cycle sustainability assessment: lessons learned from case studies, Environ Impact Asses, 87
  156. Jolliet, 2003, Impact 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505 · DOI
  157. Mancini, 2016, Ecological footprint: refining the carbon footprint calculation, Ecol Indicat, 61, 390, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040 · DOI
  158. Fang, 2014, Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family, Ecol Indicat, 36, 508, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.08.017 · DOI
  159. Weinzettel, 2014, Ecological footprint of nations: comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input-output analysis (vol 101, pg 115, 2014), Ecol Econ, 105, 350, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.001 · DOI
  160. Sen, 2019, Material footprint of electric vehicles: a multiregional life cycle assessment, J Clean Prod, 209, 1033, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.309 · DOI
  161. Harding, 2021, Status and prospects of life cycle assessments and carbon and water footprinting studies in South Africa, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 26, 26, 10.1007/s11367-020-01839-0 · DOI
  162. Galli, 2012, Integrating Ecological, Carbon and Water footprint into a "Footprint Family" of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet, Ecol Indicat, 16, 100, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017 · DOI
  163. Alvarez, 2016, Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis of carbon footprint indicator and derived recommendations, J Clean Prod, 121, 238, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.028 · DOI
  164. Hoekstra, 2009, Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis, Ecol Econ, 68, 1963, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.021 · DOI
  165. Noori, 2015, Electric vehicle cost, emissions, and water footprint in the United States: development of a regional optimization model, Energy, 89, 610, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.152 · DOI
  166. Ma, 2018, Life cycle assessment and water footprint evaluation of crude steel production: a case study in China, J Environ Manag, 224, 10
  167. Falkenmark, 2000, Competing freshwater and ecological services in the river basin perspective - an expanded conceptual framework, Water Int, 25, 172, 10.1080/02508060008686815 · DOI
  168. Lima, 2021, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries and vanadium redox flow batteries-based renewable energy storage systems, Sustain Energy Techn, 46
  169. Xie, 2018, Life cycle assessment of LFP cathode material production for power lithium-ion batteries, Spring Pr Energ, 513, 10.1007/978-981-13-0158-2_54 · DOI
  170. Azevedo, 2013, Assessing the importance of spatial variability versus model choices in life cycle impact assessment: the case of freshwater eutrophication in europe, Environ Sci Technol, 47, 13565, 10.1021/es403422a · DOI
  171. Helmes, 2012, Spatially explicit fate factors of phosphorous emissions to freshwater at the global scale, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 17, 646, 10.1007/s11367-012-0382-2 · DOI
  172. Hicks, 2018, Environmental impact, life cycle analysis and battery performance of upcycled carbon anodes, Environ Sci-Nano., 5, 1237, 10.1039/C8EN00196K · DOI
  173. Ryberg, 2014, Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1, Clean Technol Envir, 16, 329, 10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z · DOI
  174. Vidergar, 2021, A survey of the life cycle assessment of food supply chains, J Clean Prod, 286
  175. Aydin, 2021, Development of Oshawa hydrogen hub in Canada: a case study, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 23997, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.011 · DOI
  176. Subramanyan, 2007, New stochastic simulation capability applied to the GREET model, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 13, 278, 10.1065/lca2007.07.354 · DOI
  177. De Kleine, 2014, Impact of updated material production data in the GREET life cycle model, J Ind Ecol, 18, 356, 10.1111/jiec.12132 · DOI
  178. Rasul, 2020, Environmental impact assessment of green roofs using life cycle assessment, Energy Rep, 6, 503, 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.015 · DOI
  179. Galli, 2018, Eco design LCA of an innovative lab scale plant for the production of oxygen-enriched air. Comparison between economic and environmental assessment, J Clean Prod, 171, 147, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.268 · DOI
  180. Puig-Gamero, 2021, Olive pomace versus natural gas for methanol production: a life cycle assessment, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 28, 30335, 10.1007/s11356-021-12710-6 · DOI
  181. Martinez, 2015, Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study, Renew Energy, 74, 237, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.004 · DOI
  182. Liang, 2020, Environmental impact evaluation of an iron and steel plant in China: normalized data and direct/indirect contribution, J Clean Prod, 264
  183. Evangelisti, 2014, Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study, Waste Manag, 34, 226, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.013 · DOI
  184. Sangwan, 2018, Benchmarking environmental performance of electric insulator supply chain in India using life cycle assessment, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 24, 518, 10.1007/s11367-018-1455-7 · DOI
  185. Bafana, 2018, Evaluating microwave-synthesized silver nanoparticles from silver nitrate with life cycle assessment techniques, Sci Total Environ, 636, 936, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.345 · DOI
  186. Wernet, 2016, The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 21, 1218, 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 · DOI · Paper page
  187. Yang, 2020, Comparison of energy performance and environmental impacts of three corn stover-based bioenergy pathways, J Clean Prod, 272
  188. Kazan, 2020, Life cycle assessment of cotton woven shirts and alternative manufacturing techniques, Clean Technol Envir, 22, 849, 10.1007/s10098-020-01826-x · DOI
  189. Dufour, 2013, Comparative life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from cardoon (cynara cardunculus) and rapeseed oil obtained under Spanish conditions, Energy Fuel, 27, 5280, 10.1021/ef400951f · DOI
  190. Nayal, 2016, Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion, J Environ Manag, 184, 389
  191. Ghinea, 2012, Environmental evaluation of waste management scenarios - significance of the boundaries, J Environ Eng Landsc, 20, 76, 10.3846/16486897.2011.644665 · DOI
  192. Speck, 2016, Life cycle assessment software: selection can impact results, J Ind Ecol, 20, 18, 10.1111/jiec.12245 · DOI
  193. Yu, 2017, Life cycle assessment of grid-connected power generation from metallurgical route multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system in China, Appl Energy, 185, 68, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.051 · DOI
  194. Tian, 2017, Environmental impact and economic assessment of secondary lead production: comparison of main spent lead-acid battery recycling processes in China, J Clean Prod, 144, 142, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.171 · DOI
  195. Han, 2015, Life cycle assessment of ceramic facade material and its comparative analysis with three other common facade materials, J Clean Prod, 99, 86, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.032 · DOI
  196. Yang, 2018, Building-information-modeling enabled life cycle assessment, a case study on carbon footprint accounting for a residential building in China, J Clean Prod, 183, 729, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.070 · DOI
  197. Fazio, 2015, Method applied to the background analysis of energy data to be considered for the European Reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD), SpringerPlus, 4, 10.1186/s40064-015-0914-x · DOI
  198. Lai, 2022, Soft clustering of retired lithium-ion batteries for the secondary utilization using Gaussian mixture model based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, J Clean Prod, 339
  199. Schmidt, 2016, Investigation of the primary production routes of nickel and cobalt products used for Li-ion batteries, Resour Conserv Recycl, 112, 107, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.017 · DOI · Paper page
  200. Raugei, 2019, Prospective LCA of the production and EoL recycling of a novel type of Li-ion battery for electric vehicles, J Clean Prod, 213, 926, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.237 · DOI · Paper page

200 of 279 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, X., Chen, Q., Tang, X., Zhou, Y., Gao, F., Guo, Y., Bhagat, R., & Zheng, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Coventry University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Lai, Xin
  • Zheng, Yuejiu
ORCID
Venue
eTransportation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
12
Pages
100169
ISSN
2590-1168 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169
OpenAlex
W4224030340
Cited by
566
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 38
FWCI
34.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • eTransportation (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1435800)
  • Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (19QA1406200)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51877138, 51977131)
  • State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy (KF2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, life cycle assessment, battery manufacturing, battery recycling, battery remanufacturing, carbon footprint, electricity mix, environmental impact, resource consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review