Cited by 515Economic Growth and DevelopmentEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Does digital financial inclusion matter for economic growth and environmental sustainability in OBRI economies? An empirical analysis

Ozturk, Ilhan, Ullah, Sana·2022·Resources Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106489

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozturk, I., & Ullah, S.
Affiliations
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
Venue
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
185
Pages
106489
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283453639
Cited by
480
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 37
FWCI
104.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
digital financial inclusion, economic growth, environmental sustainability, CO2 emissions, Belt and Road Initiative, Belt and Road Initiative countries, environmental quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review