Cited by 9,848Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata

Roodman, David·2009·The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata

Abstract

The difference and system generalized method-of-moments estimators, developed by Holtz-Eakin, Newey, and Rosen (1988, Econometrica 56: 1371–1395); Arellano and Bond (1991, Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297); Arellano and Bover (1995, Journal of Econometrics 68: 29–51); and Blundell and Bond (1998, Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143), are increasingly popular. Both are general estimators designed for situations with “small T, large N″ panels, meaning few time periods and many individuals; independent variables that are not strictly exogenous, meaning they are correlated with past and possibly current realizations of the error; fixed effects; and heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation within individuals. This pedagogic article first introduces linear generalized method of moments. Then it describes how limited time span and potential for fixed effects and endogenous regressors drive the design of the estimators of interest, offering Stata-based examples along the way. Next it describes how to apply these estimators with xtabond2. It also explains how to perform the Arellano–Bond test for autocorrelation in a panel after other Stata commands, using abar. The article concludes with some tips for proper use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1536867x0900900106

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roodman, D.
Affiliations
Center for Global Development (US)
Corresponding author
Roodman, David
Venue
The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
Published
2009-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
86-136
ISSN
  • 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-8734
OpenAlex
W3123200913
Cited by
9,848
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1113 · 2025: 1016 · 2024: 907 · 2023: 960 · 2022: 860 · 2021: 812 · 2020: 692 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 441 · 2017: 387 · 2016: 382 · 2015: 362 · 2014: 368 · 2013: 279 · 2012: 255
FWCI
507.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
system GMM, generalized method of moments, panel data, endogenous regressors, fixed effects, Stata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review