Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading, and CO2 emissions in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of carbon emissions

Wu, Linfei, Sun, Liwen, Qi, Peixiao, Ren, Xiangwei, Sun, Xiaoting·2021·Resources Policy

Abstract

Abstract The green transformation of energy-rich areas plays a crucial role in the process of low-carbon sustainable development. It is necessary to integrate energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading and carbon emissions into the same research framework for comprehensive analysis. Using panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017, this study uses the spatial Durbin model to investigate the effects of energy endowment and industrial structure upgrading on carbon emissions. According to the empirical results, energy endowment has significantly promoted carbon emissions, and the phenomenon of ‘resource curse’ exists in the context of carbon emissions from a provincial perspective. Energy-dependent industrial structure is positively correlated with carbon emissions, which has a partial mediating effect on the influence of energy endowment on carbon emissions. In addition, the upgrading of industrial production factors and industrial level all have a negative moderating effect on the impact of energy endowment on energy-dependent industrial structure, which indirectly reducing carbon emissions. Furthermore, given the obvious regional differences in China's energy endowment and industrial structure, the impact of energy endowment on carbon emissions is higher in the eastern and western regions, and the mechanism of mediating effect exists in the eastern and western regions, but not in the central region. Therefore, the efficient use of energy sources and speeding up the industrial structure upgrading are crucial measures to reduce carbon emissions in energy-rich areas. The findings enrich ‘resource curse’ theory in the environmental field, and provide theoretical guidance for building a resource-saving and environment-friendly society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102329

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, L., Sun, L., Qi, P., Ren, X., & Sun, X.
Venue
Resources Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
74
Pages
102329
ISSN
0301-4207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198417772
Cited by
398
References
38
FWCI
54.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading, and CO2 emissions in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of carbon emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102329
The paper
Wu, L., Sun, L., Qi, P., Ren, X., & Sun, X. (2021). Energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading, and CO2 emissions in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of carbon emissions. Resources Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102329

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.