Cited by 329Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach

Wang, Xiong, Wang, Xiao, Ren, Xiaohang, Wen, Fenghua·2022·Energy Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105966

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Wang, X., Ren, X., & Wen, F.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Xiaohang
  • Wen, Fenghua
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
109
Pages
105966
ISSN
0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221130944
Cited by
329
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 48
FWCI
60.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72131011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
digital financial inclusion, CO2 emissions, prefecture-level cities, spatial spillover effects, industrial structure, economic growth, mediating mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review