The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Self-citationGrounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Zeitschrift fur Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0602 · Cited by 1,710
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 1×
“Members of these communities bring their individual domain knowledge to bear on technical problems, share solutions, promote their work, and develop and improve on technology (Franke & Shah, 2003; von Krogh et al., 2003; Jeppesen & Molin, 2003).”
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
Cited by
The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem
Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5 · Cited by 830
The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Acs, Z. J., & Sussan, F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2918535 · Cited by 336
Perspective: State‐of‐the‐Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management
Goffin, K., Åhlström, P., Bianchi, M., & Richtnér, A. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12492 · Cited by 265
What’s coming next? Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities
Schneider, A., von Krogh, G., & Jäger, P. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.008 · Cited by 106
Self-citationThe periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & von Krogh, G.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1198-1213
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084829560
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 18.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.001
- The paper
- Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
