Cited by 106Knowledge Management and SharingExpert finding and Q&A systemsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

What’s coming next? Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities

Schneider, Andreas, von Krogh, Georg, Jäger, Peter·2013·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.008

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relatively broad measure of personality traits based on the Big Five model may have failed to capture related characteristics and may contribute to the insignificant influence of personality traits in predicting TikTok usage behavior in the present study.

    “A possible explanation is that the relatively broad measure of personality traits based on the Big Five model may have failed to capture related characteristics that can explain TikTok usage behavior.”
  • Some scholars have suggested the use of specific characteristics, such as shyness and curiosity, to better understand differences in people's behavior in certain contexts.

    “some scholars [71] have suggested the use of specific characteristics, such as shyness and curiosity, to better understand differences in people behavior in certain contexts.”
  • The 90-9-1 rule classifies user participation into three categories: Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers, where 90% of actors do not participate, 9% seldom contribute, and 1% contribute significantly to the content.

    “The 90–9–1 rule classifies user participation into three categories; specifically, Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers, where 90% of actors do not participate, 9% seldom contribute, and 1% contribute significantly to the content (15, 17, 18, 22, 23).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, A., von Krogh, G., & Jäger, P.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Andreas
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
293-303
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075472600
Cited by
106
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
26.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
epistemic curiosity, online communities, contribution behavior, process-based framework, community participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review