Cited by 79Open Source Software InnovationsKnowledge Management and SharingSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation

Rullani, Francesco, Haefliger, Stefan·2013·Research Policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Akerlof, 2000, Economics and identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715, 10.1162/003355300554881 · DOI
  2. Akerlof, 2005, Identity and the economics of organizations, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 9, 10.1257/0895330053147930 · DOI
  3. Agerfalk, 2008, Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: exploring open sourcing as a global sourcing strategy, MIS Quarterly, 32, 385, 10.2307/25148845 · DOI
  4. Algesheimer, 2005, The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs, Journal of Marketing, 69, 19, 10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363 · DOI
  5. Aral, 2011, Creating social contagion through viral product design: a randomized trial of peer influence in networks, Management Science, 57, 1623, 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Arora, 1994, The changing technology of technical change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour, Research Policy, 23, 523, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01003-X · DOI
  7. Baldwin, 2006, The architecture of participation: does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model?, Management Science, 52, 1116, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546 · DOI
  8. Bonaccorsi, 2003, Why open source can succeed, Research Policy, 32, 1243, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00051-9 · DOI
  9. Borgatti, 1999, Models of core/periphery structures, Social Networks, 21, 375, 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2 · DOI
  10. Brown, 1991, Organizational learning and community-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science, 2, 40, 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · DOI
  11. Carlile, 2002, A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science, 13, 442, 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953 · DOI
  12. Cattani, 2008, A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry, Organization Science, 19, 824, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 · DOI
  13. Comino, 2007, From planning to mature: on the success of open source projects, Research Policy, 36, 1575, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.003 · DOI
  14. Cova, 2006, Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment—the case my Nutella The Community, European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1087, 10.1108/03090560610681023 · DOI
  15. Cowan, 2000, The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 211, 10.1093/icc/9.2.211 · DOI
  16. Crowston, 2005, The social structure of free and open source software development, First Monday, 10, 10.5210/fm.v10i2.1207 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dahlander, 2012, The Core and cosmopolitans: a relational view of innovation in user communities, Organization Science, 23, 988, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0673 · DOI
  18. Dahlander, 2005, Who is not developing open source software? Non-users, users, and developers, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 617, 10.1080/1043859052000344705 · DOI
  19. Dahlander, 2011, Progressing to the center: coordinating project work, Organization Science, 22, 961, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0571 · DOI · Paper page
  20. David, 2008, Dynamics of innovation in an open source collaboration environment: Lurking, laboring and launching floss projects on Sourceforge, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 647, 10.1093/icc/dtn026 · DOI
  21. Faraj, 2011, Knowledge collaboration in online communities, Organization Science, 22, 1224, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0614 · DOI
  22. Feldman, 2011, Theorizing practice and practicing theory, Organization Science, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0612 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Finholt, 1990, Electronic groups at work, Organization Science, 1, 41, 10.1287/orsc.1.1.41 · DOI
  24. Franke, 2003, Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software, Research Policy, 32, 1199, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00049-0 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Franke, 2003, How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users, Research Policy, 32, 157, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 · DOI
  26. Füller, 2008, Brand community members as a source of innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 608, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00325.x · DOI
  27. Füller, 2011, Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions, R&D Management, 41, 259, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00640.x · DOI
  28. Gächter, 2010, Initiating private-collective innovation: the fragility of knowledge sharing, Research Policy, 39, 893, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.010 · DOI
  29. Gambardella, 2006, Proprietary vs. public domain licensing of software and research products, Research Policy, 35, 875, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.004 · DOI
  30. Giuri, 2010, Skills, division of labor and performance in collective inventions: evidence from open source software, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, 54, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.07.004 · DOI
  31. Giuri, 2008, Explaining leadership in open source software projects, Information Economics and Policy, 20, 305, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.002 · DOI
  32. Golden-Biddle, 1997, Breaches in the boardroom: organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization, Organization Science, 8, 593, 10.1287/orsc.8.6.593 · DOI
  33. Haefliger, 2010, Under the radar: industry entry by user entrepreneurs, Research Policy, 39, 1198, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.001 · DOI
  34. Harhoff, 2003, Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations, Research Policy, 32, 1753, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00061-1 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hemetsberger, 2006, Learning and knowledge-building in open-source communities: a social-experiential approach, Management Learning, 37, 187, 10.1177/1350507606063442 · DOI
  36. Hertel, 2003, Motivation of software developers in the open source projects: an internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux Kernel, Research Policy, 32, 1159, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hienerth, 2011, Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models, Long Range Planning, 44, 344, 10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.009 · DOI
  38. Higgins, 1987, Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect, Psychological Review, 94, 219, 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Jarvenpaa, 2010, Vigilant interaction in knowledge collaboration: challenges of online user participation under ambivalence, Information Systems Research, 21, 773, 10.1287/isre.1100.0320 · DOI
  40. Jarvenpaa, 2011, Boundary management in online communities: case studies of the nine inch nails and ccMixter music remix sites, Long Range Planning, 44, 440, 10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.002 · DOI
  41. Jeppesen, 2006, Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments, Organization Science, 17, 45, 10.1287/orsc.1050.0156 · DOI
  42. Jeppesen, 2010, Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search, Organization Science, 21, 1016, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0491 · DOI
  43. Kirman, 2006, Searching for identity in the capability space, Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 299, 10.1080/13501780600908200 · DOI
  44. Kogut, 2001, Open-source software development and distributed innovation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17, 248, 10.1093/oxrep/17.2.248 · DOI
  45. Kuk, 2006, Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list, Management Science, 52, 1031, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0551 · DOI
  46. Kuran, 1995, The inevitability of future revolutionary surprises, American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1528, 10.1086/230671 · DOI
  47. Lakhani, K.R., 2006. The Core and Periphery in Distributed and Self-organizing Systems. PhD Diss., Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  48. Langlois, 2008, Of hackers and hairdressers: modularity and the organizational economics of open-source collaboration, Industry & Innovation, 15, 125, 10.1080/13662710801954559 · DOI
  49. Layne, 2001, Developing fully functional e-government: a four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122, 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1 · DOI
  50. Lee, 2003, From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux Kernel development, Organization Science, 14, 633, 10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Lerner, 2002, Some simple economics of open source, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 197, 10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lin, 2003, The institutionalisation of hacking practices, Ubiquity, 4, 2, 10.1145/766760.764028 · DOI
  53. Lin, 2004, Contextualising knowledge-making in Linux user groups, First Monday, 9, 10.5210/fm.v9i11.1187 · DOI
  54. Lin, 2004, Epistemologically multiple actor-centered systems: or, EMACS at work!, Ubiquity, 5
  55. Livet, 2004, La pluralité cohérente des notions de l’identiteé personnelle, Revue de Philosophie Economique, 9, 29
  56. Livet, 2006, Identities, capabilities and revisions, Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 327, 10.1080/13501780600908218 · DOI
  57. MacCormack, 2006, Exploring the structure of complex software designs: an empirical study of open source and proprietary code, Management Science, 52, 1015, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0552 · DOI
  58. MacIntosh, 1999, Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 297, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<297::AID-SMJ25>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  59. Maillart, 2008, Empirical tests of Zipf's law mechanism in open source Linux distribution, Physical Review Letters, 101, 218701-1, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.218701 · DOI
  60. Mateos-Garcia, 2008, The institutions of open source software: examining the Debian community, Information Economics and Policy, 20, 333, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.001 · DOI
  61. McAlexander, 2002, Building brand community, Journal of Marketing, 66, 38, 10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451 · DOI
  62. Mockus, 2002, Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11, 309, 10.1145/567793.567795 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Moon, 2002, The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?, Public Administration Review, 62, 424, 10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · DOI
  64. Muller, 2006, Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice, Journal of Management & Governance, 10, 381, 10.1007/s10997-006-9007-0 · DOI
  65. O’Mahony, 2003, Guarding the commons, Research Policy, 32, 1179, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9 · DOI
  66. Raymond, 1998, The cathedral and the bazaar, First Monday, 3
  67. Roberts, 2006, Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: a longitudinal study of the apache projects, Management Science, 52, 984, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0554 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Sawhney, 2001, Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets, California Management Review, 42, 24, 10.2307/41166052 · DOI
  69. Schau, 2003, We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal Web space, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 385, 10.1086/378616 · DOI
  70. Shah, 2006, Motivation, governance and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development, Management Science, 52, 1000, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Shapiro, 1987, The social-control of impersonal trust, American Journal of Sociology, 93, 623, 10.1086/228791 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Shibutani, 1955, Reference groups as perspectives, American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562, 10.1086/221630 · DOI
  73. Star, 1989, Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387, 10.1177/030631289019003001 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Szulanski, 2000, The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness RID B-3626-2010, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 9, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2884 · DOI
  75. Tuomi, 2001, Internet, innovation, and open source: actors in the network, First Monday, 6, 10.5210/fm.v6i1.824 · DOI
  76. von Hippel, 2003, Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science, Organization Science, 14
  77. von Hippel, 1994, Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation, Management Science, 40, 429, 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429 · DOI
  78. von Krogh, 2010, Opening up design science: the challenge of designing for reuse and joint development, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 232, 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.008 · DOI
  79. von Krogh, 2012, Carrots and rainbows: motivation and social practice in open source software development, MIS Quarterly, 36, 649, 10.2307/41703471 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Warkentin, 2002, Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust, Electronic Markets, 12, 157, 10.1080/101967802320245929 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Wenger, 1998, Community of practice: learning as a social system, Systems Thinker, 9, 1
  82. West, 2008, Getting clear about communities in open innovation, Industry & Innovation, 15, 223, 10.1080/13662710802033734 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S.
Affiliations
  • Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rullani, Francesco
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
941-953
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028318940
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
free and open source software, periphery, division of labor, social practices, standards, codes, asynchronous communication, open innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review