Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Industrial clusters co-evolve within the same network, often driven by cross-fertilization, as the main competitors are based outside the ecosystem or 'coopetive' relationships are formed.
“Industrial clusters co- evolve within the same network, often driven by cross- fertilization ( Autio & Levie, 2017) as the main competitors are based outside the ecosystem (Autio et al., 2018 ) or 'coopetive' relationships are formed (Gnyawali et al., 2011).”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Gnyawali et al., 2011
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461 · see citing works
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
“, 2018) or ‘coopetive’ relationships are formed (Gnyawali et al., 2011).”
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320901565 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors
Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3191 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. (.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 650-663
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985702706
- Cited by
- 1,044
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 93.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Samsung
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Keywords
- coopetition, technological innovation, large corporations, inter-firm cooperation, Samsung Electronics, Sony, benefit sharing, industry evolution, technological progress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
