The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025
The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community
O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153 · Cited by 909
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
Cited by
Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community
Bayus, B. L. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599 · Cited by 904
Open innovation: The next decade
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 · Cited by 872
Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024 · Cited by 530
How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward
Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M., & Wallin, M. W. (2021) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104218 · Cited by 253
Self-citationHow to Solve Problems with Crowds: A Computer‐Based Simulation Model
Vuculescu, O., & Bergenholtz, C. (2014) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12059 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlander, L., & Piezunka, H.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 812-827
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091616005
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 45.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.006
- The paper
- Dahlander, L., & Piezunka, H. (2014). Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
