Cited by 899Open Source Software InnovationsKnowledge Management and SharingManagement and Organizational Studies

The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community

O'Mahony, Siobhán, Ferraro, Fabrizio·2007·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

Little is known about how communities producing collective goods govern themselves. In a multimethod study of one open source software community, we found that members developed a shared basis of formal authority but limited it with democratic mechanisms that enabled experimentation with shifting conceptions of authority over time. When members settled on a shared conception of authority, it was more expansive than their original design. A statistical test of the predictors of leadership reinforced this finding. By blending bureaucratic and democratic mechanisms, the governance system evolved with the community's changing conceptions of authority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2007.27169153

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most open projects, like the Web, Wikipedia, P2P, and FOSS, showed remarkable tendencies to centralization over time.

    “In fact, most open projects (like the Web, Wikipedia, P2P, FOSS) showed remarkable tendencies to centralization over time [59].”

    From Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication (2018) · cites this paper as [59]

  • Engaging in collective action threats and expecting open source governance practices to remain unchanged is also risky as open source governance may be controlled by just a few people willing to make unilateral changes to offset collective action threats.

    “Likewise, engaging in collective action threats and expecting open source governance practices to remain unchanged is also risky as open source governance may be controlled by just a few people willing to make unilateral changes to offset collective action threats (O'Mahony and Ferraro 2007; Shaikh and Henfridsson 2017;Mindel et al. 2018).”
  • Unlike the democratically constrained positional authority observed by O'Mahony and Ferraro (2007), vendor authority in the cases lacked community engagement.

    “Unlike the democratically constrained positional authority observed by O'Mahony and Ferraro (2007), vendor authority in our cases lacked community engagement.”
  • Open source projects can simultaneously incorporate meritocratic and autocratic modes of governance, and tensions can arise from how authority is allocated and exercised within an open source project.

    “This configuration is consistent with Shaikh and Henfridsson's (2017) observation that open source projects can simultaneously incorporate meritocratic and autocratic modes of governance, and O'Mahony and Ferraro's (2007) observation that tensions can arise from how authority is allocated and exercised within an open source project.”
  • In open source, governance structures emerge later in a project's lifecycle.

    “as O'Mahony and Ferraro (2007) suggest, governance structures emerge later in a project's lifecycle”

    From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as O'Mahony and Ferraro (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Butler B. S., Leadership at a distance
  2. Fosfuri A., Organization Science
  3. Glaser B. G., 1999, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  4. March J. G., 1958, Organizations
  5. Misiolek N., 2005, Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  6. O'Mahony S., Market emergence and transformation
  7. Seidel M. L., 2001, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
  8. Shah S. K., 2005, Open sources, 2, 339
  9. Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in action
  10. Weber M., 1978, Economy and society
  11. Williams R. L., 2000, Sloan Management Review, 41, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis
  • Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2007-10
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
1079-1106
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2102704527
Cited by
899
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 49
FWCI
82.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
open source communities, community governance, authority, leadership, democratic mechanisms, public goods, governance evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review