The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Reitz, H. J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257794 · Cited by 9,172
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
An evolutionary theory of economic change
Winter, & Sidney, G. (1982) · Cited by 6,323
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Toward a theory of organizational creativity
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258761 · Cited by 4,399
Cited by
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182
“Second, as most PhD students are part of larger research teams, whose composition determines scientific impact (Lee et al., 2015), PhD students with mental health issues may pose a considerable cost to research institutions and teams.”
BackgroundFrom creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462 · Cited by 1,121
Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions
Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N., & Tang, L. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.004 · Cited by 56
Self-citationHill, R., Yin, Y., Stein, C., Wang, X., Wang, D., & Jones, B. F. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1 · Cited by 41
Bramoullé, Y., & Ductor, L. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.014 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, Y.-N., Walsh, J. P., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 684-697
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998116478
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007
- The paper
- Lee, Y.-N., Walsh, J. P., & Wang, J. (2015). Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
