Cited by 1,121Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey

Perry-Smith, Jill E., Mannucci, Pier Vittorio·2017·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Interest has burgeoned, in recent years, in how social networks influence individual creativity and innovation. From both the theoretical and empirical points of view, this increased attention has generated many inconsistencies. In this article we propose that a conceptualization of the idea journey encompassing phases that the literature has so far overlooked can help solve existing tensions. We conceptualize four phases of the journey of an idea, from conception to completion: idea generation, idea elaboration, idea championing, and idea implementation. We propose that a creator has distinct primary needs in each phase: cognitive flexibility, support, influence, and shared vision, respectively. Individual creators successfully move through a phase when the relational and structural elements of their networks match the distinct needs of the phase. The relational and structural elements that are beneficial for one phase, however, are detrimental for another. We propose that in order to solve this seeming contradiction and the associated paradoxes, individual creators have to change interpretations and frames throughout the different phases. This, in turn, allows them to activate different network characteristics at the appropriate moment and successfully complete the idea journey from novel concept to a tangible outcome that changes the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2014.0462

Cites

270 of 270 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • London Business School (GB)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2017-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
53-79
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2253551909
Cited by
1,121
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 188 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
88.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
social networks, individual creativity, innovation, idea generation, idea elaboration, idea implementation, cognitive flexibility, social support, influence, shared vision, network structure, framing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review