The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation
Open accessAbstract
Intermediation in innovation serves to establish or improve the link between different actors with complementary skill sets or interests in order to support the generation and diffusion of innovation. This article conceptualises and analyses intermediation between supply and demand using the example of public procurement of innovation. It defines specific intermediation needs and functions in different procurement situations and outlines the pre-condition for effective intermediation. The paper combines and contributes to the growing literature on innovation intermediation and public procurement of innovation. As the paper looks at the demand for innovation it adopts a broad understanding of innovation, defined as a product, service or process that is novel to the buying organisation. In order to develop the conceptualisation of intermediation in the process of demanding innovation, it builds on the existing, rather rudimentary conceptualisation of intermediation in the innovation and management literature. It presents an in-depth analysis of two very different procurement processes in two cases in a complex public sector setting, the English NHS, case of a public buying organisation triggering the generation of an innovation, and another in which an organisation sought to respond to an innovation offered in the marketplace. In both cases, the solution bought necessitated strong adaptation processes with considerable learning costs within the buying organisation. The paper shows how intelligent and tailored intermediation can tackle some of the well-known procedural and capability failures in the process of public procurement of innovation. In terms of policy implications, the article makes the claim for an increased effort to build up effective intermediation across procurement systems to support agencies in concrete procurement and, in doing so, to build up capacity for more intelligent public buying. While the focus on intermediation responds to an existing gap in the literature on public procurement of innovation, the paper has implication for demand-supply intermediation more generally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
(2003) · Cited by 9,368
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
von Hippel, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 · Cited by 4,650
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Badawy, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.05.003 · Cited by 3,566
The New Production of Knowledge
Gibbons, M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,405
An evolutionary theory of economic change
Wright, G. (1982) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/0160-791x(82)90007-0 · Cited by 3,194
The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective
(1995) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309 · Cited by 3,036
Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393655 · Cited by 2,888
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · Cited by 2,741
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,053
Cited by
Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation
De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011 · Cited by 320
Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5 · Cited by 310
Exploiting the potential of public procurement: opportunities for circular economy
Alhola, K., Ryding, S. O., Salmenperä, H., & Busch, N. J. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12770 · Cited by 284
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844 · Cited by 280
“Public procurement “is a complex market transaction with a high level of functional demands and risks involved that necessitates a broad range of capabilities” (Edler and Yeow, 2016, p.415).”
BackgroundPublic procurement as a policy tool: using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society
Grandia, J., & Meehan, J. (2017) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2017-0066 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Edler, J., & Yeow, J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 414-426
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2219882533
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 60.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010
- The paper
- Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.