Cited by 186Public Procurement and PolicyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic-Private Partnership Projects

Public procurement as a policy tool: using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society

Open access
Grandia, Jolien, Meehan, Joanne·2017·International Journal of Public Sector Management

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue and outline its major themes and challenges, their relevance and the research opportunities the field presents. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviews prior literature and outlines the need to view public procurement as a policy tool to introduce the contributions to this special issue. Findings: Public procurement has been consistently used to further public policies in a wide range of fields. The collection of articles in this special issue contributes to a broader understanding of the role and potential of public procurement in delivering desired policy outcomes in society. The articles show that public procurement largely has strategic aspirations, and its potential to deliver on wider societal issues is attractive to policy makers. The issues raised in this collection of articles, however, also demonstrate that public procurement often lacks strategic maturity and critical issues, notably around how to demonstrate and evaluate its impact and “success”. Research limitations/implications: This paper aims to stimulate interdisciplinary research into the role of public procurement as a policy tool and its ability to achieve public value. Originality/value: This paper discusses theoretical and empirical findings that highlight the importance of public procurement for achieving public value. The special issue examines the interdisciplinary literature on public procurement and shows how it is being used to achieve public value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijpsm-03-2017-0066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Public procurement has been successfully deployed as a policy lever in other areas, for example to encourage socially or environmentally beneficial outcomes.

    “Indeed, public procurement has been successfully deployed as a policy lever in other areas, for example to encourage socially or environmentally beneficial outcomes [58, 79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grandia, J., & Meehan, J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-05-08
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
302-309
ISSN
0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604410470
Cited by
186
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
Keywords
public procurement, public value, policy outcomes, impact evaluation, social problems, public sector management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review