Public procurement as a policy tool: using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue and outline its major themes and challenges, their relevance and the research opportunities the field presents. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviews prior literature and outlines the need to view public procurement as a policy tool to introduce the contributions to this special issue. Findings: Public procurement has been consistently used to further public policies in a wide range of fields. The collection of articles in this special issue contributes to a broader understanding of the role and potential of public procurement in delivering desired policy outcomes in society. The articles show that public procurement largely has strategic aspirations, and its potential to deliver on wider societal issues is attractive to policy makers. The issues raised in this collection of articles, however, also demonstrate that public procurement often lacks strategic maturity and critical issues, notably around how to demonstrate and evaluate its impact and “success”. Research limitations/implications: This paper aims to stimulate interdisciplinary research into the role of public procurement as a policy tool and its ability to achieve public value. Originality/value: This paper discusses theoretical and empirical findings that highlight the importance of public procurement for achieving public value. The special issue examines the interdisciplinary literature on public procurement and shows how it is being used to achieve public value.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Public procurement has been successfully deployed as a policy lever in other areas, for example to encourage socially or environmentally beneficial outcomes.
“Indeed, public procurement has been successfully deployed as a policy lever in other areas, for example to encourage socially or environmentally beneficial outcomes [58, 79].”
From “It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism (2026) · cites this paper as [79]
Cites
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195215 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, J., Ma, Y., Appolloni, A., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-04-2020-0035 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality
Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-07-2019-0050 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism
Hudig, A. I., Kallina, E., & Singh, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791968 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Indeed, public procurement has been successfully deployed as a policy lever in other areas, for example to encourage socially or environmentally beneficial outcomes [58, 79].”
- Authors
- Grandia, J., & Meehan, J.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Sector Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-05-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 302-309
- ISSN
- 0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604410470
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.eur.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
- Keywords
- public procurement, public value, policy outcomes, impact evaluation, social problems, public sector management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review