CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany

Rogge, Karoline S., Schleich, Joachim·2018·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Analytical framework combining firm-external and firm-internal factors
Figure 1 Analytical framework combining firm-external and firm-internal factorsCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Table 4: Regression results
Table 4: Regression resultsCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Barney, 2001, Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view, J. Manage., 27, 643
  2. Bergek, 2014, The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies, Ecol. Econ., 106, 112, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016 · DOI
  3. Borghesi, 2015, Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry, Res. Policy, 44, 669, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014 · DOI
  4. Bosetti, 2011, Politics and economics of second-best regulation of greenhouse gases: the importance of regulatory credibility, Energy J., 32, 1, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No1-1 · DOI
  5. Cai, 2014, On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China, J. Clean. Prod., 79, 239, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035 · DOI
  6. Cantner, 2016, Inventor networks in renewable energies: the influence of the policy mix in Germany, Res. Policy, 45, 1165, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.005 · DOI
  7. Costantini, 2015, Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: the case of the biofuels sector, Res. Policy, 44, 577, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011 · DOI
  8. Costantini, 2017, Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies, Res. Policy, 46, 799, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004 · DOI
  9. Dechezleprêtre, 2014, Does foreign environmental policy influence domestic innovation?: Evidence from the wind industry, Environ. Resour. Econ., 58, 391, 10.1007/s10640-013-9705-4 · DOI
  10. del Río, 2009, The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: a research agenda, Ecol. Econ., 68, 861, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.004 · DOI
  11. del Río, 2015, Resources, capabilities and competences for eco-innovation, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 22, 274, 10.3846/20294913.2015.1070301 · DOI
  12. del Río, 2016, What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 2158, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.009 · DOI
  13. Demirel, 2011, Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations, Ecol. Econ., 70, 1546, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019 · DOI
  14. Di Stefano, 2012, Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: current findings and future research directions, Res. Policy, 41, 1283, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021 · DOI
  15. Díaz-García, 2015, Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review, Innov.: Manag. Policy Pract., 17, 6, 10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060 · DOI
  16. Doblinger, 2015, An institutional perspective of public policy and network effects in the renewable energy industry: enablers or disablers of entrepreneurial behaviour and innovation?, Entrepren. Region. Dev., 28, 126
  17. Flanagan, 2011, Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation, Res. Policy, 40, 702, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005 · DOI
  18. Frondel, 2008, What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany, Ecol. Econ., 66, 153, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.016 · DOI
  19. Gallagher, 2012, The energy technology innovation system, Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour., 37, 137, 10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915 · DOI
  20. Gawel, 2013, Germany’s energy transition under attack: Is there an inscrutable German Sonderweg?, Nat. Cult., 8, 121, 10.3167/nc.2013.080201 · DOI
  21. Geels, 2016, The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014), Res. Policy, 45, 896, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 · DOI
  22. Ghisetti, 2015, Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: a meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ., 118, 57, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.009 · DOI
  23. Grau, 2014, Responsive feed-in tariff adjustment to dynamic technology development, Energy Econ., 44, 36, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.015 · DOI
  24. Guerzoni, 2015, Demand-side vs. Supply-side technology policies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix, Res. Policy, 44, 726, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009 · DOI
  25. Helm, 2003, Credible carbon policy, Oxf. Rev. Economic Policy, 19, 438, 10.1093/oxrep/19.3.438 · DOI
  26. Hermwille, 2016, The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 11, 237, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001 · DOI
  27. Hoppmann, 2013, The two faces of market support—how deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry, Res. Policy, 42, 989, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.002 · DOI
  28. Hoppmann, 2014, Compulsive policy-making—the evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power, Res. Policy, 43, 1422, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.014 · DOI
  29. Horbach, 2008, Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources, Res. Policy, 37, 163, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 · DOI
  30. Horbach, 2012, Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull, Ecol. Econ., 78, 112, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005 · DOI
  31. Horbach, 2013, Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations—An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the Community innovation survey, Ind. Innov., 20, 523, 10.1080/13662716.2013.833375 · DOI
  32. Howlett, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design, Polit. Gov., 1, 170
  33. Huenteler, 2016, Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 104, 102, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Ind. Corp. Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032 · DOI
  35. Jacobsson, 2011, Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 1, 41, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006 · DOI
  36. Jaffe, 2002, Environmental policy and technological change, Environ. Resour. Econ., 22, 41, 10.1023/A:1015519401088 · DOI
  37. Johnstone, 2010, Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts, Environ. Resour. Econ., 45, 133, 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1 · DOI
  38. Kammerer, 2009, The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2285, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.016 · DOI
  39. Kang, 2016, Investors’ reaction to the government credibility problem: a real option analysis of emission permit policy risk, Energy Econ., 54, 96, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.023 · DOI
  40. Kemp, 2011, The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — a typical case of the blind men and the elephant?, Ecol. Econ., 72, 28, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014 · DOI
  41. Kern, 2009, Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector, Policy Sci., 42, 391, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x · DOI
  42. Kesidou, 2012, On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK, Res. Policy, 41, 862, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005 · DOI
  43. Kungl, 2015, Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 8, 13, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.009 · DOI
  44. Kuzemko, 2017, Policies, politics and demand side innovations: the untold story of Germany’s energy transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 28, 58, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.013 · DOI
  45. Lauber, 2016, the politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables – the German renewable energy act, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 18, 147, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.005 · DOI
  46. Magro, 2014, Coordination-mix: the hidden face of STI, Policy. Rev. Policy Res., 31, 367, 10.1111/ropr.12090 · DOI
  47. Matthes, 2017, Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system, Evolut. Inst. Econ. Rev., 14, 141, 10.1007/s40844-016-0066-x · DOI
  48. Mowery, 1979, The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies, Res. Policy, 8, 102, 10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2 · DOI
  49. Negro, 2012, Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16, 3836, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.043 · DOI
  50. Nemet, 2014, Four decades of multiyear targets in energy policy: aspirations or credible commitments?, Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev.: Energy Environ., 3, 522
  51. Pavitt, 1984, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Res. Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · DOI
  52. Pegels, 2014, Is Germany׳s energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV, Energy Policy, 74, 522, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.031 · DOI
  53. Peters, 2012, The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – does the locus of policies matter?, Res. Policy, 41, 1296, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.004 · DOI
  54. Quitzow, 2015, Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India’s National Solar Mission, Res. Policy, 44, 233, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.003 · DOI
  55. Quitzow, 2015, Dynamics of a policy-driven market: the co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 17, 126, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.002 · DOI
  56. Quitzow, 2016, The German Energiewende – What’s happening? Introducing the special issue, Util. Policy, 41, 163, 10.1016/j.jup.2016.03.002 · DOI
  57. Reichardt, 2016, How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 18, 62, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.001 · DOI
  58. Reichardt, 2016, Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 106, 11, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 · DOI
  59. Reichardt, 2017, Unpacking policy processes for addressing systemic problems in technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 80, 1217, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.280 · DOI
  60. Rennings, 2011, The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance, Ind. Innov., 18, 255, 10.1080/13662716.2011.561027 · DOI
  61. Rexhäuser, 2014, Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the porter hypothesis, Environ. Resour. Econ., 57, 145, 10.1007/s10640-013-9671-x · DOI
  62. Richter, 2013, Business model innovation for sustainable energy: how German municipal utilities invest in offshore wind energy, Int. J. Technol. Manag., 63, 24, 10.1504/IJTM.2013.055578 · DOI
  63. Richter, 2013, German utilities and distributed PV: how to overcome barriers to business model innovation, Renew. Energy, 55, 456, 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.052 · DOI
  64. Rogge, 2018, What makes them believe in the low carbon energy transition? Exploring corporate perceptions of the credibility of climate policy mixes, Environ. Sci. Policy, 87, 74, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.009 · DOI
  65. Rogge, 2010, The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies, Energy Policy, 38, 7639, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.047 · DOI
  66. Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res. Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Rogge, 2011, The innovation impact of the EU emission trading system — findings of company case studies in the German power sector, Ecol. Econ., 70, 513, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032 · DOI
  68. Rogge, 2017, Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 33, 1, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.025 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Schleich, 2017, Effects of policies on patenting in wind-power technologies, Energy Policy, 108, 684, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.043 · DOI
  70. Schmid, 2016, Putting an energy system transformation into practice: the case of the German energiewende, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 11, 263, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.002 · DOI
  71. Schmid, 2017, Imagine all these futures: on heterogeneous preferences and mental models in the German energy transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 27, 45, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.012 · DOI
  72. Schmidt, 2012, The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 2, 23, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.002 · DOI
  73. Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Smith Stegen, 2013, The winds of change: how wind firms assess Germany’s energy transition, Energy Policy, 61, 1481, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.130 · DOI
  75. Smits, 2004, The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy, 1, 4, 10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621 · DOI
  76. Sovacool, 2009, The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy, Energy Policy, 37, 1, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.016 · DOI
  77. Strunz, 2014, The German energy transition as a regime shift, Ecol. Econ., 100, 150, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019 · DOI
  78. Taylor, 2008, Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: lessons from California’s solar policy, Energy Econ., 30, 2829, 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.06.004 · DOI
  79. Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strateg. Manage. J., 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  80. Uyarra, 2016, Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: challenges of a place-blind policy mix, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 103, 264, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.008 · DOI
  81. Veugelers, 2012, Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?, Res. Policy, 41, 1770, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.012 · DOI
  82. Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Res. Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Wernerfelt, 1984, A Resource-based view of the firm, Strateg. Manage. J., 5, 171, 10.1002/smj.4250050207 · DOI · Paper page
  84. White, 2013, The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency, Biomass Bioenergy, 57, 97, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.035 · DOI
  85. Wieczorek, 2012, Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, Sci. Public Policy, 39, 74, 10.1093/scipol/scr008 · DOI
  86. Ziegler, 2013, Disentangling technological innovations: a micro-econometric analysis of their determinants, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 58, 315, 10.1080/09640568.2013.855180 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rogge, K. S., & Schleich, J.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1639-1654
ISSN
0048-7333
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.011
Cited by
193
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  • Research Council UK’s EUED Programme (EP/K011790/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review