The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM)
Open accessAbstract
AIM To develop a valid, reliable and feasible teamwork assessment measure for emergency resuscitation team performance. BACKGROUND Generic and profession specific team performance assessment measures are available (e.g. anaesthetics) but there are no specific measures for the assessment of emergency resuscitation team performance. METHODS (1) An extensive review of the literature for teamwork instruments, and (2) development of a draft instrument with an expert clinical team. (3) Review by an international team of seven independent experts for face and content validity. (4) Instrument testing on 56 video-recorded hospital and simulated resuscitation events for construct, consistency, concurrent validity and reliability and (5) a final set of ratings for feasibility on fifteen simulated 'real time' events. RESULTS Following expert review, selected items were found to have a high total content validity index of 0.96. A single 'teamwork' construct was identified with an internal consistency of 0.89. Correlation between the total item score and global rating (rho 0.95; p<0.01) indicated concurrent validity. Inter-rater (k 0.55) and retest reliability (k 0.53) were 'fair', with positive feasibility ratings following 'real time' testing. The final 12 item (11 specific and 1 global rating) are rated using a five-point scale and cover three categories leadership, teamwork and task management. CONCLUSION In this primary study TEAM was found to be a valid and reliable instrument and should be a useful addition to clinicians' tool set for the measurement of teamwork during medical emergencies. Further evaluation of the instrument is warranted to fully determine its psychometric properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 8,990
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20147 · Cited by 7,510
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Wik, L. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.299 · Cited by 1,538
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature
MANSER, T. (2009) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x · Cited by 1,322
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Abella, B. S. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.305 · Cited by 1,185
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg112 · Cited by 958
Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT)
Endsley, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference · doi:10.1109/naecon.1988.195097 · Cited by 956
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest
Abella, B. S., Alvarado, J. P., & Myklebust, H. (2005) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/j.accreview.2005.03.040 · Cited by 941
Cited by
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Perkins, G. D., Handley, A. J., Koster, R. W., Castrén, M., Smyth, M. A., Olasveengen, T., Monsieurs, K. G., Raffay, V., Gräsner, J.-T., Wenzel, V., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015 · Cited by 1,287
Cook, D. A., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., Hatala, R., & Brydges, R. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4 · Cited by 317
Oseni, Z., Than, H. H., Kolakowska, E., Chalmers, L., Hanboonkunupakarn, B., & McGready, R. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-0975-3 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, S., Cant, R., Porter, J., Sellick, K., Somers, G., Kinsman, L., & Nestel, D.
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 446-452
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072210724
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.027
- The paper
- Cooper, S., Cant, R., Porter, J., Sellick, K., Somers, G., Kinsman, L., & Nestel, D. (2010). Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
