Cited by 142Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEmergency Medicine Education and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are trained individuals more likely to perform bystander CPR? An observational study

Abstract

Background This study aimed to evaluate the association of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with bystander resuscitation performance and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods This was a prospective, population-based cohort study of all persons aged 18 years or older with OHCA of presumed intrinsic origin and their rescuers from January through December 2008 in Takatsuki, Osaka prefecture, Japan. Data on resuscitation of OHCA patients were obtained by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel in charge based on the Utstein style. Rescuers' characteristics including experience of CPR training were obtained by EMS personnel interview on the scene. The primary outcome was the attempt of bystander CPR. Results Data were collected for 120 cases out of 170 OHCAs of intrinsic origin. Among the available cases, 60 (50.0%) had previous CPR training (trained rescuer group). The proportion of bystander CPR was significantly higher in the trained rescuer group than in the untrained rescuer group (75.0% and 43.3%; p = 0.001). Bystanders who had previous experience of CPR training were 3.40 times (95% confidence interval 1.31-8.85) more likely to perform CPR compared with those without previous CPR training. The number of patients with neurologically favorable one-month survival was too small to evaluate statistical difference between the groups (2 [3.3%] in the trained rescuer group versus 1 [1.7%] in the untrained rescuer group; p = 0.500). Conc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.027

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tanigawa, K., Iwami, T., Nishiyama, C., Nonogi, H., & Kawamura, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP)
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Iwami, Taku
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
523-528
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078373667
Cited by
141
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
Keywords
bystander CPR, CPR training, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, neurologically favorable survival, emergency medical services
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Technicians, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prospective Studies, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review