Cited by 115Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of trained volunteers in the response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – the GoodSAM experience

Open access

Abstract

In England, fewer than 1 in 10 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims survive to hospital discharge. This could be substantially improved by increasing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator use. GoodSAM is a mobile-phone, app-based system alerting trained individuals to nearby cardiac arrests. 'Responders' can be notified by bystanders using the GoodSAM 'Alerter' function. In London, when a 999 call-handler identifies cardiac arrest, in addition to dispatching the usual professional resources, London Ambulance Service automatically activates nearby GoodSAM responders. This article discusses the development of GoodSAM, its integration with London Ambulance Service, and the plans for future expansion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPR is promoted as a highly effective treatment both in the popular press and in dedicated media campaigns.

    “CPR is promoted as a highly effective treatment both in the popular press and in dedicated media campaigns. 260”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [260]

    The Introduction says that bystander CPR can substantially affect survival and that motivating the public to help is important. It does not address how CPR is portrayed in the popular press or dedicated media campaigns; searches for those forms of promotion found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Hawkes, 2017, Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in England, Resuscitation, 110, 133, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.10.030 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Deakin, 2014, Public access defibrillation remains out of reach for most victims of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, Heart, 100, 619, 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305030 · DOI
  3. Perkins, 2015, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation, Resuscitation, 95, 81, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015 · DOI
  4. Colquhoun, 2008, A national scheme for public access defibrillation in England and Wales: early results, Resuscitation, 78, 275, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.226 · DOI
  5. Blom, 2014, Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and use of automated external defibrillators, Circulation, 130, 1868, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010905 · DOI
  6. Lindner, 2011, Good outcome in every fourth resuscitation attempt is achievable—an Utstein template report from the Stavanger region, Resuscitation, 82, 1508, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.016 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Agerskov, 2015, Public Access Defibrillation: Great benefit and potential but infrequently used, Resuscitation, 96, 53, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.021 · DOI
  8. Ringh, 2015, Mobile-Phone Dispatch of Laypersons for CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, N Engl J Med, 372, 2316, 10.1056/NEJMoa1406038 · DOI
  9. Rea, 2010, A population-based investigation of public access defibrillation: role of emergency medical services care, Resuscitation, 81, 163, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.10.025 · DOI
  10. Ho, 2014, Investigation of availability and accessibility of community automated external defibrillators in a territory in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Med J, 20, 371
  11. Chan, 2013, Identifying Locations for Public Access Defibrillators Using Mathematical Optimization, Circulation, 127, 1801, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001953 · DOI
  12. Brooks, 2016, The pulsepoint respond mobile device application to crowdsource basic life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: challenges for optimal implementation, Resuscitation, 98, 20, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.09.392 · DOI
  13. Zijlstra, 2014, Local lay rescuers with AEDs, alerted by text messages, contribute to early defibrillation in a Dutch out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dispatch system, Resuscitation, 85, 1444, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.020 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Perkins, 2015, Part 3: Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations, Resuscitation, 95, e43, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.041 · DOI
  15. Rumsfeld, 2016, Use of Mobile Devices, Social Media, and Crowdsourcing as Digital Strategies to Improve Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, Circulation, 134, e87, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000428 · DOI
  16. Wilson, 2016, Impact brain apnoea – A forgotten cause of cardiovascular collapse in trauma, Resuscitation, 105, 52, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Henriksen, 2015, The FirstAED global positioning system organizes a first responder team with distinct roles and ensures the possibility for early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation [abstract], Resuscitation, 96

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, C. M., Wilson, M. H., Ghorbangholi, A., Hartley-Sharpe, C., Gwinnutt, C., Dicker, B., & Perkins, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
  • Resuscitation Council (GB)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Smith, Christopher M.
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
121
Pages
123-126
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765350538
Cited by
115
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • amber - ambulance research repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10139)
  • British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander CPR, automated external defibrillators, volunteer responders, ambulance dispatch, London Ambulance Service
MeSH terms
Electric Countershock, Emergency Medical Services, Humans, London, Volunteers, Program Development, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Cell Phone, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Time-to-Treatment, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review