Beyond English: chatGPT's instructions across EU languages
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All prompts were in English because previous studies have indicated that GPT is optimized for tasks prompted in English.
“All prompts were in English as previous studies (Haman, 2024; Lai et al., 2023) have indicated that GPT is optimized for tasks prompted in this language.”
From ChatGPT for President! Presupposed content in politicians versus GPT-generated texts (2025) · cites this paper as Haman, 2024
The Abstract reports that English was among the highest-performing languages for ChatGPT-generated CPR instructions, alongside Dutch and Polish. That supports an English-performance rationale, but this test of one medical task does not establish that GPT is generally optimized for tasks prompted in English. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Birkun, A. A. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106224 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
ChatGPT for President! Presupposed content in politicians versus GPT-generated texts
Garassino, D., Brocca, N., & Masia, V. (2025) · Applied Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100156 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“All prompts were in English as previous studies (Haman, 2024; Lai et al., 2023) have indicated that GPT is optimized for tasks prompted in this language.”
Haman, M., Školník, M., & Kučírková, K. (2024) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdae269 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Haman, M.
- Affiliations
- Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Haman, Michael
- ORCID
- Haman, Michael
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 110367
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401689736
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, multilingual language models, CPR training, European Union official languages, artificial intelligence in healthcare
- MeSH terms
- European Union, Humans, Language, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
