Cited by 11Peatlands and Wetlands EcologyGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchSoil and Environmental Studies

Does peatland drainage damage the palaeoecological record?

Davies, Heather, Fyfe, Ralph, Charman, Dan·2015·Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.05.009

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drainage ditches have been less often archaeologically or historically studied than irrigation ditches, although this is changing with the global rise in the importance and value placed on peatland landscapes for biodiversity and carbon sequestration.

    “Despite this, drainage ditches have been less often archaeologically or historically studied than irrigation ditches, although this is changing with the global rise in the importance and value placed on peatland landscapes for biodiversity and carbon sequestration 51 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, H., Fyfe, R., & Charman, D.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, Heather
Venue
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
221
Pages
92-105
ISSN
0034-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W592862256
Cited by
11
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Great Western Research
  • Exmoor National Park Sustainable Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
peatland drainage, pollen preservation, upland peatlands, paleoclimate reconstruction, anthropogenic land use, Exmoor, peat core

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review