The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The variability of Amazonian palm phytoliths
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Palms are prolific phytolith producers with morphologies specific to subtribe or often genus, and can thus be used to detect palm enrichment or depletion.
“Palms are prolific phytolith producers with morphologies specific to subtribe or often genus (Witteveen et al. 2022), and can thus be used to detect palm enrichment or depletion.”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Witteveen et al. 2022
Socratea exorrhiza and Astrocaryum produce a similar morphotype (CON_FEW).
“Socratea exorrhiza and Astrocaryum also produce a similar morphotype (CON_FEW) (Witteveen et al. 2022).”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Witteveen et al. 2022
In the Surinamese rainforests, SPH_ECH phytoliths are produced by Euterpe, Oenocarpus, Attalea, Hyospathe elegans and Cocos nucifera and Conicals are produced by Astrocaryum, Bactris and Socratea exorrhiza palms.
“In the Surinamese rainforests, SPH_ECH phytoliths are produced by Euterpe, Oenocarpus, Attalea, Hyospathe elegans and Cocos nucifera and Conicals are produced by Astrocaryum, Bactris and Socratea exorrhiza palms”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Witteveen et al. 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Abràmoff, 2004, Image processing with imageJ, Biophotonics Int., 11, 36
- Åkesson, 2021, Long-term ecological legacies in western Amazonia, J. Ecol., 109, 432, 10.1111/1365-2745.13501 · DOI · Paper page
- Albert, 2009, Palaeoecological significance of palms at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, based on phytolith remains, Quat. Int., 193, 41, 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.06.008 · DOI
- Ball, 2016, Morphometric analysis of phytoliths: recommendations towards standardization from the International Committee for Phytolith Morphometrics, J. Archaeol. Sci., 68, 106, 10.1016/j.jas.2015.03.023 · DOI
- Benvenuto, 2015, Differentiation of globular phytoliths in Arecaceae and other monocotyledons: Morphological description for paleobotanical application, Turk. J. Bot., 39, 341, 10.3906/bot-1312-72 · DOI
- Chen, 2013, Phytolith variability in Zingiberales: a tool for the reconstruction of past tropical vegetation, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 370, 1, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.10.026 · DOI
- Clement, 1988, Domestication of the Pejibaye Palm (Bactris gasipaes), Past and Present, 6, 155
- Collura, 2017, Wood and bark phytoliths of West African woody plants, Quat. Int., 434, 142, 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.070 · DOI · Paper page
- Eiserhardt, 2011, Geographical ecology of the palms (Arecaceae): determinants of diversity and distributions across spatial scales, Ann. Bot., 108, 1391, 10.1093/aob/mcr146 · DOI
- Faurby, 2016, An all-evidence species-level supertree for the palms (Arecaceae), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 100, 57, 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.002 · DOI
- Fauset, 2015, Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling, Nat. Commun., 6, 1, 10.1038/ncomms7857 · DOI
- Fenwick, 2011, Palm reading: a pilot study to discriminate phytoliths of four Arecaceae (Palmae) taxa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 2190, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.016 · DOI
- Heijink, 2020, Holocene increases in palm abundances in north-western Amazonia, J. Biogeogr., 47, 698, 10.1111/jbi.13721 · DOI · Paper page
- Huisman, 2018, Palm phytoliths of mid-elevation Andean forests, Front. Ecol. Evol., 6, 1, 10.3389/fevo.2018.00193 · DOI · Paper page
- Kristiansen, 2009, Commonness of Amazonian palm (Arecaceae) species: Cross-scale links and potential determinants, Acta Oecol., 35, 554, 10.1016/j.actao.2009.05.001 · DOI
- Levis, 2017, Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition, Science (80-. ), 355, 925, 10.1126/science.aal0157 · DOI · Paper page
- Lombardo, 2020, Early Holocene crop cultivation and landscape modification in Amazonia, Nature, 581, 190, 10.1038/s41586-020-2162-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Macia, 2011, Palm uses in northwestern South America: a quantitative review, Bot. Rev., 77, 462, 10.1007/s12229-011-9086-8 · DOI
- Maezumi, 2018, The legacy of 4,500 years of polyculture agroforestry in the eastern Amazon, Nat. Plants, 4, 540, 10.1038/s41477-018-0205-y · DOI · Paper page
- McMichael, 2012, Sparse pre-Columbian human habitation in Western Amazonia, Science (80-.), ). 336, 1429, 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
- McMichael, 2015, Phytolith assemblages along a gradient of ancient human disturbance in Western Amazonia, Front. Ecol. Evol., 3, 1, 10.3389/fevo.2015.00141 · DOI
- McMichael, 2017, Comment on “persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition.”, Science (80-. ), 358, 1, 10.1126/science.aan8347 · DOI · Paper page
- McMichael, 2021, 30,000 years of landscape and vegetation dynamics in a mid-elevation Andean valley, Quat. Sci. Rev., 258, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106866 · DOI
- Morcote-Rios, 2001, Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the New World: a review, Bot. Rev., 67, 309, 10.1007/BF02858098 · DOI
- Morcote-Ríos, 2016, Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 182, 348, 10.1111/boj.12438 · DOI
- Muscarella, 2020, The global abundance of tree palms, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 1
- Neumann, 2019, International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0, Ann. Bot., 124, 189, 10.1093/aob/mcz064 · DOI
- Piperno, 2020, Phytoliths in modern plants from Amazonia and the neotropics at large: implications for vegetation history reconstruction, Quat. Int., 565, 54, 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.043 · DOI · Paper page
- Piperno, 2019, Finding forest management in prehistoric Amazonia, Anthropo., 26, 100211
- Piperno, 2021, A 5,000-year vegetation and fire history for tierra firme forests in the Medio Putumayo-Algodón watersheds, northeastern Peru, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118, 10.1073/pnas.2022213118 · DOI · Paper page
- Ter Steege, 2013, Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora, Science (80-. ), 342
- ter Steege, 2020, Biased-corrected richness estimates for the Amazonian tree flora, Sci. Rep., 10, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-66686-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Thomas, 2012, Analysis of a protohistoric net from Shahi Tump, Baluchistan (Pakistan), Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci., 4, 15, 10.1007/s12520-011-0078-8 · DOI
- Vormisto, 2004, Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin, J. Ecol., 92, 577, 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00904.x · DOI
- Watling, 2013, Phytoliths from the coastal savannas of French Guiana, Quat. Int., 287, 162, 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.030 · DOI
- Whitney, 2014, Pre-Columbian raised-field agriculture and land use in the Bolivian Amazon, Holocene, 24, 231, 10.1177/0959683613517401 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sanchez Martinez, B. A., Booij, R., Philip, A., Gosling, W. D., Bush, M. B., & McMichael, C. N. H. (2024) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-023-00932-2 · Cited by 20
Self-citationPre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sánchez‐Martínez, B. A., Philip, A., Boyd, F., Booij, R., Christ, R., Singh, S., Gosling, W. D., Piperno, D. R., et al. (2024) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.4272 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Witteveen, N. H., Hobus, C. E. M., Philip, A., Piperno, D. R., & McMichael, C. N. H.
- Venue
- Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 300
- Pages
- 104613
- ISSN
- 0034-6667
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review