The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Palm Phytoliths of Mid-Elevation Andean Forests
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SPHEROID ECHINATE phytoliths, considered diagnostic of Arecaceae (palms), were discovered in both profiles from Santa María (Pe10-26, Pe11-06), while they were present in very low abundance in the soil control profile Pe10-32 and terrace profile Pe10-30 from Ayllapampa.
“Surprisingly, SPHEROID ECHINATE phytoliths, considered diagnostic of Arecaceae (palms) (Huisman et al., 2018; International Committee for Phytolith Taxonomy (ICPT), 2019), were discovered in both profiles from Santa María (Pe10-26, Pe11-06), while they were present in very low abundance in the soil control profile Pe10-32 and terrace profile Pe10-30 from Ayllapampa (Fig. 7).”
From The impact of agriculture on tropical mountain soils in the western peruvian andes: a pedo-geoarchaeological study of terrace agricultural systems in the laramate region (14.5° S) (2024) · cites this paper as Huisman et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Bernal, 2011, Palm management in South America, Bot. Rev., 77, 607, 10.1007/s12229-011-9088-6 · DOI
- Bowdery, 2015, An enigma revisited: identification of palm phytoliths extracted from the 1983 Rapa Nui, Rano Kao2 core, Veg. Hist. Archaeobot., 24, 455, 10.1007/s00334-014-0503-x · DOI
- Bush, 2002, Distributional change and conservation on the Andean flank: a palaeoecological perspective, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 11, 463, 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00305.x · DOI
- Bush, 2007, “Andean montane forests and climate change,”, 33, 10.1007/978-3-540-48842-2_2 · DOI
- Bush, 2011, “Andean montane forests and climate change,”, 35, 10.1007/978-3-642-05383-2_2 · DOI
- Bush, 2005, A 17,000 year history of Andean climatic and vegetation change from Laguna de Chochos, Peru, J. Q. Sci., 20, 703, 10.1002/jqs.983 · DOI
- Cabanes, 2015, Understanding fossil phytolith preservation: the role of partial dissolution in paleoecology and archaeology, PLoS ONE, 10, e0125532, 10.1371/journal.pone.0125532 · DOI
- Carson, 2014, Environmental impact of geometric earthwork construction in pre-Columbian Amazonia, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 10497, 10.1073/pnas.1321770111 · DOI
- Dickau, 2013, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 193, 15, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Flenley, 1979, The late quaternary vegetational history of the equatorial mountains, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 3, 488, 10.1177/030913337900300402 · DOI
- Gnecco, 2003, Against ecological reductionism: late pleistocene hunter-gatherers in the tropical forests of northern South America, Q. Int., 109, 13, 10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00199-4 · DOI
- Henderson, 1997, Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas
- Kahn, 2012, Palms in Forest Ecosystems of Amazonia
- Kahn, 1990, Palm communities in wetland forest ecosystems of Peruvian Amazonia, For. Ecol. Manage., 33, 169, 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90191-D · DOI
- Mora, 2003, Early Inhabitants of the Amazonian Tropical Rain Forest: A Study of Humans and Environmental Dynamics
- Moraes, 1995, “Tropical Andean palms (Arecaceae),”, 473
- Morcote-Rios, 2001, Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the new world: a review, Bot. Rev., 67, 309, 10.1007/BF02858098 · DOI
- Morcote-Ríos, 2016, Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 182, 348, 10.1111/boj.12438 · DOI
- Olson, 2002, The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation, Ann. Miss. Bot. Gardens, 89, 199, 10.2307/3298564 · DOI
- Olson, 2001, Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth, Bioscience, 51, 933, 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Phillips, 2002, Global Patterns of Plant Diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry's Forest Transect Data Set.
- Piperno, 2006, Phytoliths: A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists, 10.5040/9798216409281 · DOI · Paper page
- Piperno, 2005, Dinosaurs dined on grass, Science, 310, 1126, 10.1126/science.1121020 · DOI
- Pitman, 2001, Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests, Ecology, 82, 2101, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2101:DADOTS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Prasad, 2005, Dinosaur coprolites and the early evolution of grasses and grazers, Science, 310, 1177, 10.1126/science.1118806 · DOI
- Schiferl, 2017, Vegetation responses to late Holocene climate changes in an Andean forest, Q. Res., 89, 60, 10.1017/qua.2017.64 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 2014, Palms and People in the Amazon
- Strömberg, 2004, Using phytolith assemblages to reconstruct the origin and spread of grass-dominated habitats in the great plains of North America during the late Eocene to early Miocene, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 207, 239, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2003.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
- Strömberg, 2011, The Neogene transition from C3 to C4 grasslands in North America: assemblage analysis of fossil phytoliths, Paleobiology, 37, 50, 10.1666/09067.1 · DOI
- ter Steege, 2013, Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora, Science, 2, 1243092, 10.1126/science.1243092 · DOI · Paper page
- Tomlinson, 2011, The Anatomy of Palms: Arecaceae-Palmae, 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199558926.001.0001 · DOI
- Vormisto, 2004, Palm distribution patterns in Amazonian rainforests: What is the role of topographic variation?, J. Veg. Sci., 15, 485, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02287.x · DOI
- Watling, 2016, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions II: southwestern Amazonian forests, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 226, 30, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.12.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sanchez Martinez, B. A., Booij, R., Philip, A., Gosling, W. D., Bush, M. B., & McMichael, C. N. H. (2024) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-023-00932-2 · Cited by 20
Self-citationLeceta, F., Binder, C., Mader, C., Mächtle, B., Marsh, E., Dietrich, L., Reindel, M., Eitel, B., & Meister, J. (2024) · Soil · doi:10.5194/soil-10-727-2024 · Cited by 14
Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sánchez‐Martínez, B. A., Philip, A., Boyd, F., Booij, R., Christ, R., Singh, S., Gosling, W. D., Piperno, D. R., et al. (2024) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.4272 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huisman, S. N., Raczka, M. F., & McMichael, C. N. H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-11-27
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-701X
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review