The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Holocene increases in palm abundances in north‐western Amazonia
Abstract
Aim: In Amazonia, 227 of c. 16,000 tree species account for half the individual trees (termed ‘hyperdominant’ species), and a disproportionate number of these species are palms. Our objectives are to show how and whether palm abundance has changed through the Holocene. Here, we reconstruct a detailed fire and vegetation history from north‐western Amazonia, with a focus on changes in palm abundances, and compare our results with regional data. Location: Amacayacu, Colombia. Taxon: Amazonian palms. Methods: We performed charcoal and phytolith analysis on soil cores, and obtained ages of past fires using 14 C dating. We measured charcoal abundances and the relative abundances of phytoliths (silica‐based microfossils) for all samples. We used these data to reconstruct changes in fire and vegetation, and compared these data with the species composition of palms in the modern forest. Results: Seven 14 C dates from charcoal in three cores provided fire ages ranging from 1630 to 2450 calibrated years before present. Charcoal was absent from one‐third of the cores. Palm phytoliths from genera such as Iriartea, Socratea, and Astrocaryum have increased through time, while genera such as Euterpe, Hyospathe, and Oenocarpus have remained relatively stable and similar to modern levels. Overall, palm abundances were negatively correlated with charcoal measurements. Decorated sphere phytoliths, produced from unknown arboreal taxa were positively correlated with charcoal presence and abundance. Main conclusions: Palms have increased at Amacayacu and other forest plots through time, but the increases are largest in north‐western Amazonia. The presence of fire, however, dampens the increase in palms through time. When compared with reconstructions from other Amazon regions, our results suggest that increases in palm abundances in the late Holocene occurred both in the presence and absence of direct pre‐Columbian human influence, and that response was strongest in north‐western Amazonia when human influence was minimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings.
“This and other Neotropical studies show that high abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) and low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings (Dickau et al. 2013; Heijink et al. 2020; Watling et al. 2020; Piperno et al. 2021).”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Heijink et al. 2020
Across the Neotropics, palms can comprise up to 60% of the phytolith assemblage of closed canopy forests.
“Across the Neotropics, palms can comprise up to 60% of the phytolith assemblage of closed canopy forests (Dickau et al. 2013; Heijink et al. 2020; Crifò and Strömberg 2021).”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Heijink et al. 2020
Our results confirm previous studies from high biomass regions of the northwestern Amazon where soil core samples contained a lack of grasses, herbs, and cultivars, and were interpreted as having little to no evidence of past forest opening.
“Our results also confirm previous studies from high biomass regions of the northwestern Amazon (Fig. 6B) where soil core samples contained a lack of grasses, herbs, and cultivars, and were interpreted as having little to no evidence of past forest opening (McMichael et al. 2012a, b, 2015; Heijink et al. 2020; Piperno et al. 2021).”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Heijink et al. 2020
High abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) reflect closed canopy forested settings.
“This and other Neotropical studies show that high abundances of arboreal phytoliths (> 60%) and low abundances of phytoliths from grasses and herbs (< 4%) reflect closed canopy forested settings (Dickau et al. 2013; Heijink et al. 2020; Watling et al. 2020; Piperno et al. 2021).”
From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Heijink et al. 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 86
- Abramoff M. D., 2004, Image processing with ImageJ, Biophotonics International, 11, 36
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.08.030 · DOI
- Almeida F. O., 2014, Antes de Orellana: Actas del 3rd Encuentro Internacional de Arqueologia Amazonica, 175
- 10.1111/gcb.12712 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.0013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.03.022 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.12600 · DOI
- 10.1111/jbi.12638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/340303a0 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.0014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00020.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2662:EFATLS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.0813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00141276 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-11-48 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10531-016-1265-9 · DOI
- 10.3390/f10020128 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms7857 · DOI
- 10.5194/bg-9-3381-2012 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.85.1.156 · DOI
- 10.2307/2399464 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gca.2010.11.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-662-05683-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature17176 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.045 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.165.3889.131 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00257.x · DOI
- Henderson A., 1997, Field guide to the palms of the Americas
- 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI
- 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16783 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-0182(94)90074-4 · DOI
- Hubbell S. P., 2001, The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography
- 10.3389/fevo.2018.00193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00345.x · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.13315 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10531-010-9813-1 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aal0157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fevo.2017.00171 · DOI · Paper page
- Lombardo U., 2013, Human–environment interactions in pre‐Columbian Amazonia: The case of the Llanos de Moxos, Bolivia, 109
- 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01312.x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-018-0205-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1146961 · DOI
- 10.1017/qua.2018.152 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1614577114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fevo.2015.00141 · DOI
- Medina J., 1934, The discovery of the Amazon according to the account of Friar Caspar de Carvajal and other documents
- 10.1111/boj.12438 · DOI
- Morcote‐Rios G., 2013, Terras Pretas de Índio of the Caquetá‐Japurá River (Colombian Amazonia), Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South. America, 11, 30
- 10.1038/35002501 · DOI · Paper page
- Pärssinen M., 2003, Western Amazonia – Amazonia ocidental, 97
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1516525113 · DOI · Paper page
- Piperno D. R., 2006, Phytoliths: A comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists
- 10.1086/659998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/qres.1996.0020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0959683615588374 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100211 · DOI · Paper page
- R Development Core Team, 2013, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
- 10.1029/2007EO210003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jbi.12518 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.272.5260.373 · DOI · Paper page
- Rudas Lleras A. N., 2005, Flórula del Parque Nacional Natural Amacayacu
- 10.1016/0033-5894(86)90095-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.227.4682.53 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00234-2 · DOI
- 10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1423147112 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05134 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1243092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jbi.12540 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1078037 · DOI
- 10.2307/1940299 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1614359114 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0199868 · DOI
- 10.1191/0959683605hl795rr · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.009 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00217.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98333.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-004-1554-y · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1192666 · DOI
- 10.1002/ecy.1950 · DOI
- Zuleta D., 2018, Importance of topography for tree species habitat distributions in a terra firme forest in the Colombian Amazon, Plant and Soil, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sanchez Martinez, B. A., Booij, R., Philip, A., Gosling, W. D., Bush, M. B., & McMichael, C. N. H. (2024) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-023-00932-2 · Cited by 20
Self-citationPre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sánchez‐Martínez, B. A., Philip, A., Boyd, F., Booij, R., Christ, R., Singh, S., Gosling, W. D., Piperno, D. R., et al. (2024) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.4272 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heijink, B. M., McMichael, C. N. H., Piperno, D. R., Duivenvoorden, J. F., Cárdenas, D., & Duque, Á.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 698-711
- ISSN
- 0305-0270
- 1365-2699
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Center for Tropical Forest Science-ForestGEO (341243)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review