Cited by 26Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Coping strategies among adults with ADHD: The mediational role of attachment relationship patterns.

Al-Yagon, Michal, Lachmi, Michal, Shalev, Lilach·2020·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Background For adults with attention/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), research is scarce on their coping with stress (despite studies demonstrating other self-regulation deficits) and their attachment patterns (despite rare research in younger persons with ADHD showing high vulnerability to insecure attachments). Attachment was linked with coping and self-regulation in general populations but not yet in ADHD. This study explored the possible mediational role of attachment patterns in explaining associations between adults' ADHD symptoms and dysregulated coping. Methods Participants comprised 62 adults (32 females, 30 males) ages 21-40 years (M = 27.60, SD = 4.80) in two groups: 31 adults with formally diagnosed ADHD and 31 demographically matched adults without ADHD. Instruments included computerized neuropsychological tests (sustained/executive attention) and self-reports (ADHD, coping, attachment). Results Disorder status was verified via ADHD-symptom self-reports and computerized testing. Preliminary analyses revealed significant intergroup differences on coping strategies and attachment. PROCESS analyses (Hayes, 2013) pinpointed attachment measures' mediating role (especially attachment anxiety) regarding ADHD's association with coping. Conclusions Significantly more maladaptive attachment and coping outcomes emerged for adults with ADHD than controls. Attachment insecurity's role in mediating ADHD's association with coping was partially supported. Possible unique adaptive…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103657

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Yagon, M., Lachmi, M., & Shalev, L.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
102
Pages
103657
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018622179
Cited by
26
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adult ADHD, coping strategies, insecure attachment, attachment anxiety, stress coping, maladaptive coping, mediation, executive function, sustained attention, self-regulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review