Cited by 107Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A systematic review of adult attachment and social anxiety

Open access
Manning, Ray P.C., Dickson, Joanne M., Palmier-Claus, Jasper, Cunliffe, Alexandra, Taylor, Peter J.·2017·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Attachment has been implicated in the development of social anxiety. Our aim was to synthesise the extant literature exploring the role of adult attachment in these disorders. Method Search terms relating to social anxiety and attachment were entered into MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using and adapted version of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality assessment tool. Eligible studies employed validated social anxiety and attachment assessments in adult clinical and analogue samples. The review included cross sectional, interventional and longitudinal research. Results Of the 30 identified studies, 28 showed a positive association between attachment insecurity and social anxiety. This association was particularly strong when considering attachment anxiety. Cognitive variables and evolutionary behaviours were identified as potential mediators, concordant with psychological theory. Limitations Due to a lack of longitudinal research, the direction of effect between attachment and social anxiety variables could not be inferred. There was substantial heterogeneity in the way that attachment was conceptualised and assessed across studies. Conclusions The literature indicates that attachment style is associated with social anxiety. Clinicians may wish to consider attachment theory when working clinically with this population. In the future, it may be useful to target the processes that mediate the relationship between attachment and social anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.020

Cites

92 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B., 1995. Structured clinical interview for DSM- IV axis I disorders-patient edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
  2. Fortson, B.L., 2005. Risk and Resilience in Youth: An Examination of Moderating Factors (Ph.D. thesis). West Virginia University, USA.
  3. Lionberg, C.A., 2003. Characteristics and quality of personal relationships in generalized social phobia (Ph.D. thesis). University of Manitoba, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manning, R. P. C., Dickson, J. M., Palmier-Claus, J., Cunliffe, A., & Taylor, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Manning, Ray P.C.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
211
Pages
44-59
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566122962
Cited by
107
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
adult attachment, social anxiety, insecure attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment styles, attachment theory, cognitive mediators, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Object Attachment, Phobic Disorders, Risk Factors, Social Desirability, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review