Cited by 75Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational exposure and asthma

The effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with asthma: A systematic review of the literature

Open access
Bruurs, Marjolein L.J., van der Giessen, Lianne J., Moed, Heleen·2013·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Since the introduction of medical therapy for asthma the interest in non-medical treatments deteriorated. Physiotherapy could have beneficial effects in asthmatics. This review investigates the effectiveness of physiotherapy in the treatment of patients with asthma. A review was performed on the terms breathing exercises (BE), inspiratory muscle training (IMT), physical training (PhT) and airway clearance (AC) in patients with asthma. The search resulted in 237 potentially relevant articles, after exclusion 23 articles remained. BE (n = 9) may improve disease specific quality of life (QoL), reduce symptoms, hyperventilation, anxiety and depression, lower respiratory rate and medication use. IMT (n = 3) can improve inspiratory pressure and may reduce medication use and symptoms. PhT (n = 12) can reduce symptoms, improve QoL and improve cardiopulmonary endurance and fitness. In conclusion, physiotherapy may improve QoL, cardiopulmonary fitness and inspiratory pressure and reduce symptoms and medication use. Further studies, investigating combinations of techniques, are needed to confirm these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.12.017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van der Giessen, 2005, KNGF-richtlijn Astma bij kinderen, Ned Tijdschr Fysioth, 115, s1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruurs, M. L. J., van der Giessen, L. J., & Moed, H.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Moed, Heleen
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
483-494
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017964556
Cited by
75
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
physiotherapy, asthma, breathing exercises, inspiratory muscle training, exercise training, airway clearance, quality of life, symptom relief, medication use, cardiorespiratory fitness, inspiratory pressure, hyperventilation
MeSH terms
Inhalation, Asthma, Breathing Exercises, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Respiratory Muscles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review