Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges
Abstract
Various forms of machine learning (ML) methods have historically played a valuable role in environmental remote sensing research. With an increasing amount of “big data” from earth observation and rapid advances in ML, increasing opportunities for novel methods have emerged to aid in earth environmental monitoring. Over the last decade, a typical and state-of-the-art ML framework named deep learning (DL), which is developed from the traditional neural network (NN), has outperformed traditional models with considerable improvement in performance. Substantial progress in developing a DL methodology for a variety of earth science applications has been observed. Therefore, this review will concentrate on the use of the traditional NN and DL methods to advance the environmental remote sensing process. First, the potential of DL in environmental remote sensing, including land cover mapping, environmental parameter retrieval, data fusion and downscaling, and information reconstruction and prediction, will be analyzed. A typical network structure will then be introduced. Afterward, the applications of DL environmental monitoring in the atmosphere, vegetation, hydrology, air and land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, solar radiation, and ocean color are specifically reviewed. Finally, challenges and future perspectives will be comprehensively analyzed and discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of noise in images can act as a deterrent in the course of various tasks in image processing, such as facial recognition, form processing, and environmental remote sensing.
“The presence of noise in images can act as a deterrent in the course of various tasks in image processing, like facial recognition [1], form processing [2], environmental remote sensing [3], etc.”
From Median Filter Aided CNN Based Image Denoising: An Ensemble Approach (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., & Johnson, B. A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 · Cited by 2,456 · see citing works
Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks
Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13890 · Cited by 1,445 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine Learning Methods for Weather Forecasting: A Survey
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., & Li, N. (2025) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos16010082 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
ATSS Deep Learning-Based Approach to Detect Apple Fruits
Biffi, L. J., Mitishita, E., Liesenberg, V., Santos, A. A. D., Gonçalves, D. N., Estrabis, N. V., Silva, J. D. A., Osco, L. P., Ramos, A. P. M., Centeno, J. A. S., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13010054 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Median Filter Aided CNN Based Image Denoising: An Ensemble Approach
Dey, S., Bhattacharya, R., Schwenker, F., & Sarkar, R. (2021) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a14040109 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“The presence of noise in images can act as a deterrent in the course of various tasks in image processing, like facial recognition [1], form processing [2], environmental remote sensing [3], etc.”
BackgroundZheng, Q., & Ding, Q. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268007 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sky and Ground Segmentation in the Navigation Visions of the Planetary Rovers
Kuang, B., Rana, Z. A., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21216996 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Estébanez-Camarena, M., Taormina, R., van de Giesen, N., & ten Veldhuis, M.-C. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15071922 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ci, J., Tan, H., Zhai, H., & Tang, X. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16162953 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., Gao, J., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Huanfeng
- ORCID
- Venue
- Remote Sensing of Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 111716
- ISSN
- 0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008439211
- Cited by
- 1,697
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 194 · 2025: 374 · 2024: 368 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 253 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 39
- FWCI
- 97.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Keywords
- deep learning, environmental remote sensing, land cover mapping, data fusion, downscaling, artificial neural networks, atmospheric monitoring, vegetation monitoring, hydrology, land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, solar radiation, ocean color
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review