Cited by 1,697Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing and Land UseRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges

Yuan, Qiangqiang, Shen, Huanfeng, Li, Tongwen, Li, Zhiwei, Li, Shuwen, Jiang, Yun, Xu, Hongzhang, Tan, Weiwei +4 more·2020·Remote Sensing of Environment

Abstract

Various forms of machine learning (ML) methods have historically played a valuable role in environmental remote sensing research. With an increasing amount of “big data” from earth observation and rapid advances in ML, increasing opportunities for novel methods have emerged to aid in earth environmental monitoring. Over the last decade, a typical and state-of-the-art ML framework named deep learning (DL), which is developed from the traditional neural network (NN), has outperformed traditional models with considerable improvement in performance. Substantial progress in developing a DL methodology for a variety of earth science applications has been observed. Therefore, this review will concentrate on the use of the traditional NN and DL methods to advance the environmental remote sensing process. First, the potential of DL in environmental remote sensing, including land cover mapping, environmental parameter retrieval, data fusion and downscaling, and information reconstruction and prediction, will be analyzed. A typical network structure will then be introduced. Afterward, the applications of DL environmental monitoring in the atmosphere, vegetation, hydrology, air and land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, solar radiation, and ocean color are specifically reviewed. Finally, challenges and future perspectives will be comprehensively analyzed and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of noise in images can act as a deterrent in the course of various tasks in image processing, such as facial recognition, form processing, and environmental remote sensing.

    “The presence of noise in images can act as a deterrent in the course of various tasks in image processing, like facial recognition [1], form processing [2], environmental remote sensing [3], etc.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., Gao, J., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shen, Huanfeng
Venue
Remote Sensing of Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
241
Pages
111716
ISSN
0034-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008439211
Cited by
1,697
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 194 · 2025: 374 · 2024: 368 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 253 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 39
FWCI
97.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Remote Sensing of Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
deep learning, environmental remote sensing, land cover mapping, data fusion, downscaling, artificial neural networks, atmospheric monitoring, vegetation monitoring, hydrology, land surface temperature, evapotranspiration, solar radiation, ocean color

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review